Hildebrand Law, P.C. mobile logo

Enforcing a Premarital Agreement in Arizona | Hildebrand Law, PC

Sat 17th Dec, 2016 Arizona Divorce Laws

The Arizona Court of Appeals made a decision on the validity of a premarital agreement and the division of marital assets in the case of Pownall v. Pownall.

In 1990, shortly after the parties began living together Mr. Pownall purchased a home. He paid the down payment and mortgage using his earnings with the title in his name only. Mr. Pownall and his stepfather opened four pizza franchise locations in which he had a fifty percent interest, using only his earnings to finance the businesses.

Then, in 1994, the parties decided to marry and Mr. Pownall had his attorney create a premarital agreement to keep his interests in the pizza businesses, as well as any future businesses, separate. Both parties met with the attorney, where it was explained to Mrs. Pownall that he would only be representing Mr. Powall’s interests and she had the right to have another attorney review the agreement before she signed it. She declined to hire another attorney and after reading through the document, she signed it. The parties married, but a little over two years later Mr. Pownall filed for dissolution.

During their divorce proceedings, the trial court decided that their premarital agreement was invalid because Mrs. Pownall was unaware of the full extent of the property subject to the agreement. The trial court also concluded that a quasi-marital partnership existed and awarded Mrs. Pownall half of the interest that Mr. Pownall owned in his pizza franchises, less the money he contributed to the franchise fee from his separate property.

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

Next, the court awarded Mrs. Pownall a sum of money for her share of the income in the year that the parties were separated and awarded Mr. Pownall the residence. The court denied the wife’s request for spousal maintenance based on the property already awarded to her, the short length of the marriage, and her current employment.

Mr. Pownall appealed their decisions to the Arizona Court of Appeals arguing that the trial court erred in finding the premarital agreement invalid because Mrs. Pownall failed to meet the burden of proof that it was unconscionable or that she didn’t voluntarily sign the agreement.

The appeals court ruled that not only had the attorney that prepared the agreement given a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property value, but Mrs. Pownall knew the lifestyle that the businesses provided and could have independently assessed their value.

Premarital Agreements in Arizona | The Ruling

The Arizona Court of Appeals also commented that since she declined the opportunity to hire a separate attorney to protect her interests, she could not later claim they were not on equal bargaining terms. Also, the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded there is no evidence proving she was unfairly compelled to sign the document and thus ruled the premarital agreement to be valid.

Having declared the premarital agreement valid, the appeals court also reviewed the ruling the trial court made in regard to the division of the business interests. The parties agreed the husband purchased his interest in the pizza franchises previous to their marriage, but Mrs. Pownall argued they agreed to combine their efforts to acquire property jointly.

The court found that, although the parties maintained joint checking accounts, Mrs. Pownall’s name did not appear on any of the documents for the residence or the businesses and she did not contribute funds to purchase or maintain either.

The court added that the premarital agreement, signed by both parties, clearly indicated the husband’s intention to keep the home and businesses as his sole and separate property. Because the evidence did not support her claims, the appeals court ordered that the home and businesses would remain his separate property.

Mr. Pownall also appealed the trial court’s order to pay the wife a share of his income for the year they were separated. The trial court found that while she had exclusive use of the residence, he was still paying the mortgage. He argued that because she had possession, but was not paying the mortgage for the residence, it would not be fair and equitable to require him to pay her a share of his income during the parties’ separation. The court decided that the reimbursement award was equitable and remanded the decision to the trial court for the adjusted amount to be awarded.

Mrs. Pownall cross-appealed the court’s order denying her spousal maintenance, which had been denied because of the short time the parties were married, her gainful employment, and the property that had been previously awarded to her.

She argued that she lacked sufficient property to meet her reasonable needs and that she was unable to support herself through her employment. Because the appeals court found the premarital agreement to be valid, Mrs. Pownall would not be entitled to receive any portion of the values of the residence or the businesses.

Hildebrand Law, PC Voted Best Divorce Law Firm in Arizona in Arizona Foothills Magazine

Therefore, they remanded the decision regarding alimony back to the trial court taking into consideration the new circumstances of the marital property that will now not be awarded to her.

This case illustrates the importance of having a premarital agreement reviewed by separate attorneys working on behalf of each party’s interests when entering into a marriage with a premarital agreement so that all parties are aware of all benefits and consequences of signing the agreement.

Also, that property acquired during the marriage that wasn’t expressly agreed by both parties to be community property will, in almost all situations, be awarded to the party who purchased it. Lastly, the amount of spousal maintenance, if any, to be awarded may be impacted by the amount of marital property each spouse is awarded in the proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions About Enforceability of Arizona Prenuptial Agreements

Are premarital agreements enforceable in Arizona?

Yes. Arizona courts generally enforce valid premarital (prenuptial) agreements during a divorce if they meet the requirements of Arizona law. The agreement must be in writing, signed by both parties, entered into voluntarily, and not be unconscionable at the time it was executed. Courts also examine whether both spouses received fair financial disclosure or validly waived that disclosure before signing.


What makes a premarital agreement unenforceable in Arizona?

A premarital agreement may be unenforceable if a spouse proves:

  • They did not sign the agreement voluntarily.
  • The agreement was unconscionable when signed.
  • They were not provided fair and reasonable financial disclosure and also did not knowingly waive financial disclosure in writing.

Can a judge refuse to enforce a prenuptial agreement?

Yes. Arizona judges can decline to enforce all or part of a premarital agreement if it fails to meet the legal requirements established under Arizona’s Uniform Premarital Agreement Act. The court determines whether the agreement was voluntarily signed and whether it was unconscionable based on the circumstances existing when it was executed.


Does a premarital agreement override Arizona community property laws?

Yes, it can. A valid premarital agreement may change how Arizona’s community property laws apply by defining certain property as separate property, determining how assets will be divided, or establishing financial rights if the marriage ends in divorce. However, the agreement must comply with Arizona law to be enforceable.


Can a premarital agreement affect spousal maintenance in Arizona?

Yes. Arizona premarital agreements may include provisions modifying or waiving spousal maintenance (alimony). However, if enforcing that provision would leave one spouse eligible for public assistance, a court may require support to prevent that outcome despite the agreement.


Who has the burden of proving a premarital agreement is invalid?

The spouse challenging the premarital agreement has the burden of proving why it should not be enforced. This may involve demonstrating that the agreement was signed under duress, lacked proper financial disclosure without a corresponding written waiver of that financial disclosure, or was unconscionable at the time it was executed.


When is a premarital agreement enforced during a divorce?

A premarital agreement is typically enforced during the divorce process when issues involving property division, debt allocation, or spousal maintenance arise. If one spouse challenges the agreement, the court generally resolves the enforceability question before applying its terms to the divorce.


Can only part of a premarital agreement be enforced?

Yes. In some cases, an Arizona court may enforce valid provisions while refusing to enforce provisions that violate the law or are otherwise unenforceable. Whether individual provisions can be separated depends on the agreement’s language and the circumstances of the case.


Why should I hire an attorney to enforce or challenge a premarital agreement?

Premarital agreement disputes often involve complex legal questions regarding contract law, financial disclosure, community property, and spousal maintenance. An experienced Arizona divorce attorney can evaluate whether the agreement satisfies Arizona’s statutory requirements, identify potential challenges, and advocate for enforcement or invalidation in court.

Arizona Prenuptial Agreement Attorneys

If you have questions about enforcing a premarital agreement in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce and family law attorneys have decades of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce or family law case around today.


As Seen on CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, and Fox News

Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys, PC As Seen in the News.
Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys, PC As Seen in the News.