Attorney’s Conflict of Interest
Attorneys in Arizona cannot accept representation against former clients where they might devolve confidential information. If they do, they are subject to disqualification and sanctions. In Lalliss v. Hagerty et al., No. 1 CA-CV 15-0545 FC, the Arizona Court of Appeals discussed this issue. This decision was unpublished, which means it cannot be cited as authority in a case.
Facts of the Case
In 2010, Mrs. Hagerty and Mr. Hagerty divorced. After the divorce, the former spouses filed numerous post-decree petitions. Mrs. Hagerty hired attorney Mr. Lalliss to represent her in these motions. At an evidentiary hearing in September 2014, Mr. Hagerty’s attorney moved to disqualify Mr. Lalliss as counsel for Mrs. Hagerty. He claimed Mr. Lalliss had a conflict of interest.
Mr. Lalliss had represented Justin in various matters in the past. The court granted the motion. It disqualified Mr. Lalliss and required him to pay Mr. Hagerty’s fees and the costs of bringing the action. Mr. Lalliss asked the court to set aside the disqualification and fee award. The court denied this, ordering Mr. Lallis to pay $2,362.25 in attorney fees and costs to Mr. Hagerty’s counsel.
[arve url=”https://vimeo.com/147784440″ thumbnail=”4031″ title=”Attorney Conflict of Interest in an Arizona Divorce.” description=”Learn About an Attorney Conflict of Interest in an Arizona Divorce Case from Our Arizona Licensed Attorney Chris Hildebrand of Hildebrand Law, PC.” upload_date=”2019-02-05″ duration=”1M52S” maxwidth=”640″ /]
Arizona’s Conflict of Interest Rules
On appeal, Mr. Lalliss argues his prior representation of Mr. Hagerty did not create a conflict of interest. He claims that his prior representation of Mr. Hagerty in the three matters did not relate to “the same or a substantially related matter” under Arizona Rules. The Arizona Ethical Rules provide:
“A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interest of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.”
A court has the authority to disqualify an attorney who represents conflicting interests. The comments to the rule explain that matters are “substantially related” to the rule “if they involve the same transaction or legal dispute or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the client’s position in the subsequent matter.”
Confidential information is defined as “information relating to the representation of a client.” This principle is grounded in the confidential relationship between an attorney and a client. This rule is intended to protect any shared information from disclosure and wrongful use. The comments give the following example:
“[A] lawyer who has represented a businessperson and learned extensive private financial information about that person may not then represent that person’s spouse in seeking a divorce.”
Mr. Lalliss’s Conflict of Interest
In this case, Mrs. Hagerty and Mr. Hagerty were arguing about parenting time, child support, medical reimbursement, and attorney fees. Mrs. Hagerty claimed that the children suffered emotionally after they spent time with Mr. Hagerty. She also claimed that he was behind in child support, and Mr. Hagerty had lost many civil cases.
Mr. Lalliss represented Justin in three prior cases. He could have obtained information relevant to one of the couple’s current disputes. Where it is possible that an attorney received confidential information related to a subsequent case, the attorney must be disqualified.
The Court found that the family court did not abuse its discretion in disqualifying Mr. Lalliss from representing Mrs. Hagerty in the post-decree proceedings. Likewise, the Court found the award of fees and costs appropriate.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the family court’s orders. It remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
If you have questions about attorney’s conflict of interest in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce and family law cases.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce or family law case around today.
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about conflict of interest in regards to accepting representaton against former client in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.
As Seen on CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, and Fox News