Embryos in a Divorce in Arizona
The Arizona Court of Appeals, in its published opinion in Terrel v. Torres, — P.3d—, Ariz.App. (2019), had to consider what to do with frozen embryos in a divorce when the parties had signed an in vitro fertilization agreement but disagreed on the interpretation of the terms.
Before their marriage, Husband and Wife executed an in vitro fertilization (“IVF”) agreement.
The IVF procedure yielded seven viable embryos that were cryogenically preserved for future use. After two years of marriage, Husband filed for divorce.
The seven embryos were still preserved, and there had been no attempt at implantation.
Husband and Wife could not agree on the disposition of the embryos, specifically, whether the court could award the embryos to Wife so that she could achieve a pregnancy.
Neither party contested the validity of the IVF agreement.
The dispute arose from the interpretation of the contract.
However, Husband and Wife’s agreement also stated that in the event of a divorce, disposition of the embryos, including the use to achieve pregnancy, would be controlled by the court.
Contract Versus Balancing Approach on Embryos in an Arizona Divorce
After reviewing how other states have handled this issue, the Court of Appeals adopted the “contract approach” for deciding this issue.
Under the contract approach, an agreement between parties regarding the disposition of embryos is generally presumed to be valid and enforceable.
If parties have no agreement or if the agreement leaves the decision to the court, then the court will use the “balancing approach” to decide.
In the balancing approach, the court balances the competing interests of the parties.
The critical component of the balancing approach is that the party wishing to avoid procreation should prevail if the other party has a reasonable possibility of achieving parenthood without the use of the embryos in question.
Wife’s Interest in Embryos Outweighed Husband’s Interest in Avoiding Procreation
The Court of Appeals first resolved the contract issue and ruled that the parties’ affirmative agreement to have the court control the disposition of the embryos overcame the more general note in the agreement that required both parties’ written consent to use the embryos to create a pregnancy.
Having concluded that the IVF agreement placed the decision with the court, the Court of Appeals then used the balancing approach and determined that due to a variety of factors, Wife had less than a one percent chance of having a biological child and that adoption was unlikely.
Because of this, the Court of Appeals ruled that Wife’s interest in the embryos outweighed Husband’s interest in avoiding procreation and remanded the case to the trial court for an order awarding the embryos to Wife.
More Articles About Child Custody in Arizona
- Access to a Child’s Medical Records in Arizona
- Adoption Attorneys in Arizona
- Required Affidavit in a Child Custody Case in Arizona
- Are Mothers Favored Custody Battles in Arizona
- Arizona Child Custody Attorneys
- Arizona Child Custody Statutes
- Arizona Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act Statutes
- Changing a Child’s Last Name in Arizona
- Changing Child Custody in Arizona
- Child Custody and Child Support in Arizona
- Child Custody In Arizona
- Child Custody Laws in Arizona
- Child Custody Rights in Arizona
- Co-Parenting After Divorce in Arizona
- Custody of a Child to Grandparent in Arizona
- Delegation of Custody Decisions in Arizona
- Divorce and Grandparents Visitation in Arizona
- Effective Co-Parenting in Arizona
- Emergency Child Custody in Arizona
- Emergency Child Custody Orders in Arizona
- Enforce Parenting Time or Custody in Arizona
- Enforce Visitation Non-Custodial Parent in Arizona
- Grandparent’s Rights in Arizona
- How is Child Custody Determined in Arizona
- How to Change a Child’s Last Name in Arizona
- How to Enforce Parenting Time in Arizona
- How to Get Sole Custody in Arizona
- How to Modify Child Custody in Arizona
- How to Modify Visitation in Arizona
- Joint Custody and School Decisions in Arizona
- Joint Custody vs Sole Custody Arizona
- Joint Legal Custody or Joint Decision Making in Arizona
- Modifying Visitation With a Child in Arizona
- Moving Children Many Times in Arizona
- Order of Protection and Child Custody in Arizona
- Parent Information Program Class in Arizona
- Parent Move Out of State With A Child From Arizona
- Parental Alienation in Arizona
- Prepare for Child Custody Evaluation in Arizona
- Presumption of Equal Parenting Time in Arizona
- Restrictions in Arizona on Taking Children to Another Country
- Sole Legal Custody or Sole Decision Making in Arizona
- Sole or Joint Custody in Arizona
- Temporary Child Custody in Arizona
- Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act in Arizona
- What Are the Child Custody Factors in Arizona
- What Determines Child Custody in Arizona
- What is a Child Custody Evaluation in Arizona
- What is a Parenting Coordinator in an Arizona Child Custody Case
- What Is Domestic Violence in Arizona
- What Types of Child Custody Are There in Arizona
- What Visitation or Parenting Time Schedules do Judges Order in Arizona
- Who Has Custody of Children When a Divorce is Filed in Arizona
- Who Is the Best Child Custody Lawyer in Arizona
- Withholding Child From Custodial Parent in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about appealing an arbitration award in a divorce in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about divorce laws in Arizona. Chris is a family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and actually caring about what his clients are going through.