Can Visitation With a Child Be Reduced Without Prior Notice | Voted “Best of the Valley”
Posted on : April 24, 2018, By: Christopher Hildebrand
Can Visitation With a Child Be Reduced Without Prior Notice in Arizona
The Short Answer
The short answer is “no” with one pretty major exception. The Arizona Court of Appeals in the case of Contreras v. Bourke ruled that parenting time cannot be reduced without the parent receiving proper notice that his or her parenting time may be reduced prior to the hearing at which the parenting time is reduced. This is based upon the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, which requires a parent to receive notice of a hearing aimed at reducing his or her parenting time and an opportunity to defend oneself at that hearing.
The major exception to the ruling in the Contreras v. Bourke case is when a child’s safety is at imminent risk of harm and, therefore, the judge issues an order terminating contact between the parent and the child. Even then, the judge must schedule a quick hearing to allow that parent to present evidence that an emergency does not actually exist. Continue reading about the case of Contreras v. Bourke to learn more.
The Long Answer
In the unpublished decision of Contreras v. Bourke, the Arizona Court of Appeals addressed whether a mother, Nancy, was denied due process of law when an Arizona family court judge issued an order decreasing the amount of time she could spend with the parties’ child. It is important to note this decision was not published by the Arizona Court of Appeals, which means you may not cite this decision as the authority in support of your position with some limited exceptions.
Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.
The pertinent facts were that the Court issued a Temporary Child Custody Order granting parenting time to both Roger and Nancy. That Temporary Order also provided for an increase in Nancy’s parenting time when the parties’ child turned three years old. The court subsequently held a final trial and issued a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage granting Nancy and the child’s father, Roger, specific rights of parenting time, but neglected to include the Temporary Orders provision increasing Nancy’s parenting time when the child turned three years old.
Jennifer, thank you for being my attorney. I could not have been more pleased with the outcome of my family court hearing. Everything you have done for me throughout this case reflects in the final ruling of the judge. You helped me keep my head together and taught me a lot about myself as a person. I learned so much about my life from observing and listening to you. I will take all the advice you gave me to continue taking responsibility for my choices, continue to put the kids' needs first, and always stay truthful. Your diligence, dedication, and persistence in my case made what seemed impossible, possible. You are a wonderful person and an amazing attorney and I am stronger and more confident because of you.
I just want to again thank the Firm for working with me all that it has. I could not have done anything without everyone's assistance. You, Chris and Stacey have been and continue to provide me with compassion and hard work towards my case. Also a very special thanks to Kip for taking my case in the beginning. Also continued support from him and his dedication to providing me with his expertise in this matter.
After interviewing several law firms, I came across Jennifer Shick, and her firm, who I hired to represent me for my Family Court case. Jennifer has extensive knowledge of the law and is determined to bring the truth to every issue involved within the case. Throughout my case, Jennifer was prepared meticulously as well as went above and beyond all of my expectations. Even when the other party tried to differ from the truth, lie to the Judge, and turn situations around, Jennifer remained attentive and provided substantial evidence to show the judge the facts as well as the proof to support what was the best interests of my children. Additionally, Jennifer helped me endure many difficult experiences, situations and inspired me to remain positive throughout the entirety of my case. Her kindness, compassion, and professionalism helped me through very difficult times and made the process feel a thousand times lighter on my shoulders. She truly has my children and my best interest at heart and I trust her perspective as well as her honesty on each and every aspect of my case. She lessened the burden on my shoulders and even when I felt like the case was not going to go in my favor, Jennifer was open-minded and reassured me that the Judge would, in fact, see the truth, which he did and the case went in my favor. After nine months of court, everything finally came together. I cannot declare how much Jennifer has been an outstanding attorney. She addressed each and every issue with diligence, she cares about her clients and their families. Jennifer genuinely cares about her clients and her dedication to the details of the case was remarkable. Overall, I am extremely pleased with Jennifer’s services and I am truly thankful that I was so blessed to have her represent my children and me. I highly recommend Jennifer as one of the best attorneys in Arizona and if the situation ever arises, I will definitely have her represent my children and me again.
Dear Stacey and Kip, How can I ever thank you enough for helping me through the most difficult time in my life? I couldn't put into words my heartfelt gratefulness. You both were so compassionate and professional at every given moment throughout this process with me. I thank you from the bottom of my heart. You helped me to regain my freedom.
I was a client of Attorney Kevin Park for the dissolution of a divorce in 2016. And since I had never had the need to hire an attorney before for any purpose, I was somewhat apprehensive of the process. But the very calm and professional demeanor of Mr. Park eased my fears. He adeptly answered all my questions and I clearly knew the process and what to expect. And the skilled manner he communicated with opposing counsel was perfect. When it came down to negotiating with my spouse’s counsel, I knew I had selected the best attorney for my situation. What I noticed and appreciated was that he was using just the right amount of pressure with opposing counsel as was necessary. If you find yourself in this situation, you will want a seasoned professional like Mr. Park on your side. I'm very grateful that he was my attorney and not the opposition!
Chris is a smart and aggressive attorney for his clients. Chris always tries to reach a fair settlement of his cases. I’ve represented clients when Chris was the opposing counsel and while he is professional and amicable to work with, he does not back off on what he needs to do for his client
Kevin Park of Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys was just what I needed for my divorce. He was very approachable and personable. He was quick to recognize what I needed and provided it quickly and efficiently. I hope to never need a divorce lawyer again, but if I know anyone else who does, I will definitely recommend Kevin.
I feel that Tracey Van Wickler is certainly one of the best family lawyers around. She is logical, intelligent, and truly cares. Tracey always does what is in the clients best interest, does it well, timely and with integrity. She is good at keeping her clients informed as to what is going on and clear in her communication both written and verbally. I have recommended Tracey to other people and will continue to recommend her. I recommended Tracey to someone who was having issues with their ex-wife and his response was, “I know how good she is because I went up against her and she ate me for lunch”. This same person was so impressed with her, he even recommended her to someone else, WOW, that is impressive! I am exceptionally happy with her attention to detail, her ability to explain things in ways that are easy to understand, as well as her ability to keep everyone focused on the most important things. I would recommend Tracey to anyone who may be in need of her services.
I retained Hildebrand Law after interview a number of firms in the valley. Working with Michael C. was incredibly easy and informative. My case progressed in such a organized and thought out way to ensure that my needs were met. Michael was incredibly proactive and was able to see far ahead into my case to steer clear of some roadblocks. I would not hesitate to recommend Michael Clancy, and Hildebrand Law in general, to anyone.
I have worked with Hildebrand law for about 8 years. They are always ready to serve, provide guidance and give you a few options. When they provide you options they also take the time to walk you through the pros and cons of each and give you a recommendation of what is best, but will listen to you and support whatever course you choose after making and educated choice. I’d recommend them to my closest friends and feel Chris Hildebrand is now a friend to me.
Despite the unfortunate situation I found myself in, Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law helped me maneuver every step with professionalism, expertise, and even a sensitivity that was an added bonus.Chris and his staff helped me even when I didn't know I needed the help. In other words. . . they made sure we did not leave anything undone. And in the rare instance we needed the expertise of another professional, Chris knew exactly who to recommend.Chris also knew, because of his experience, what to anticipate down the road of litigation. That meant we were better prepared to meet the challenges head on, which lead to a more equitable and fair outcome. I appreciated that Chris did his best to meet my every need in a timely fashion, even if I had a simple question that required only a phone call or e-mail or if we needed to talk face-to-face.I highly recommend Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law, PC.
After subsequent disputes continued to arise between the parties, the Court appointed a Parenting Coordinator to assist in resolving the day to day disputes that may arise between the parties regarding the implementation of the parenting plan set forth in the parties’ Decree of Dissolution of Marriage.
Can Parenting Time With a Child Be Reduced Without Prior Notice in Arizona?
The assigned Parenting Coordinator issued a report to the court requesting clarification of the parenting plan set forth in the final Decree. Specifically, the Parenting Coordinator inquired as to whether the court made an error in the Decree when it failed to provide for an increase in Nancy’s parenting time when the child reached the age of three. The trial court responded to the inquiry by indicating it had made the mistake and that it intended to provide for an increase in Nancy’s parenting time when the child turned three years of age. The court then directed the Parenting Coordinator to make a recommendation to expand Nancy’s parenting time and minimize contact between the parties.
The Parenting Coordinator subsequently submitted a recommendation to the Court. Father’s sole objection to the report was to the Parenting Coordinator’s recommendation that the parent scheduled to receive parenting time shall pick up the child from daycare no earlier than 12:30 pm. Father wanted the court to order that neither parent may pick up the child earlier than 4:30 pm.
Reduction of Parenting Time Not Allowed Without Notice in Arizona
The court scheduled a trial on Roger’s objection and subsequently issued an order modifying parenting time. That order actually decreased Nancy’s parenting time with the parties’ child. Nancy appealed the court’s decrease in her parenting time. Her appeal was that she was denied due process of law. The Arizona Court of Appeal agreed.
The Arizona Court of Appeals held that at no time did the Parenting Coordinator nor Father file a Petition to Modify Parenting Time and, thus, Nancy had no prior notice that a decrease in her parenting time was at issue before the hearing. As a result, she did not present evidence she otherwise would have presented had she received prior notice a decrease in her parenting time could be ordered.
Reduction of Parenting Time Not Allowed Without Notice in Arizona.
The court also concluded that although the court asked the Parenting Coordinator to provide a recommendation for the implementation of Nancy’s increased parenting time when the child turned three, the Court could not ask the parenting coordinator to issue recommendations decreasing Mother’s parenting time by even one day because that would violate Rule 74(E) precluding a Parenting Coordinator from making a recommendation that would “substantially” decrease her parenting time.
The take away from this case is that the filing of an objection to a Parenting Coordinator’s report does not permit a court to decrease a parent’s parenting time unless that parent also files a Petition for Modification of Parenting Time requesting a decrease in the other parent’s parenting time. Also, the court violates a parent’s constitutional right to due process by subsequently decreasing a parent’s parenting time under such circumstances. The other take away is that a Parenting Coordinator cannot make a recommendation that would reduce a parent’s parenting time by as little as one day.
If you have a question about child custody in Arizona, please call to speak to one of our experienced Scottsdale and Phoenix Arizona child custody attorneys at (480)305-8300.