Skip to Content
Hildebrand Law, P.C. mobile logo

Modification of Custody and Child Abduction in AZ | Hildebrand Law, PC

Wed 23rd Nov, 2016 Arizona Child Custody Laws

Generally, an Arizona divorce court determines custody issues if the children are before the court. What if the children are only before the court because they were abducted by a noncustodial parent? The Arizona Court of Appeals discussed this issue in the case Stuard v. Bean, 554 P.2d 1293 (1976).

Facts and Background

Mr. Ziglar and Mrs. Ziglar married in Alabama and had two daughters. Mr. Ziglar’s mother, Mrs. Stuard, also lived in Alabama. When Mr. Ziglar and his wife had marital problems, Mr. Ziglar asked his mother (Mrs. Stuard) to take custody of the girls. She agreed and the girls went to live with her in February 1975.

Several months later, the Alabama circuit court awarded legal custody of the girls to Mrs. Stuard. In the meantime, Mrs. Ziglar moved to Arizona and obtained a divorce in Cochise County. The divorce order did not rule on custody. It said that custody must be determined under Alabama law since the children were not in Arizona.

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

Soon after the divorce, Mrs. Ziglar married Mr. Lindo. She then went to court in Alabama to try to regain custody of the two girls. The Alabama court ordered that the girls stay with Mrs. Stuard while it investigated the Lindo and Stuard households. However, the court allowed Mrs. Ziglar to have the children for a weekend.

That weekend, Mrs. Ziglar and her new husband took the children to Arizona and did not return them to Alabama. Mrs. Ziglar petitioned the Arizona court in Pinal County for a temporary child custody order. She also asked it to amend the decree issued in Cochise County.

Mr. Ziglar and his mother came to Arizona with the Alabama orders and returned the girls to Alabama. However, four hooded persons abducted the two girls and returned them to Arizona. Mr. Ziglar and his mother returned to Arizona and petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, which was issued. It directed that the two girls be placed in the custody of a justice of the peace, pending a hearing.

Mr. Ziglar and Mrs. Stuard asked the court to order that the Alabama court had initial child custody jurisdiction and that the Cochise County court did not. At that hearing, the Pinal County court declined to rule on whether the Cochise County court had child custody jurisdiction. It said the court in Cochise County should make that ruling. It ordered the children to remain with juvenile authorities in Pinal County until the Cochise County court ruled on that issue.

Mr. Ziglar and Mrs. Stuard brought this special action. It challenges the refusal of the Arizona court to decide the jurisdictional issue.

Procedure When Children Abducted

Modification of Child Custody Orders Involving a Child Abduction in Arizona.

The Court of Appeals first considered whether a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus was the proper procedural device here. It determined that it was the appropriate procedure when children have been taken from the person having legal custody.

It next ruled that the court failed to act appropriately when it declined to rule on the jurisdictional issue. The Court of Appeals looked at the issue itself. It determined that the Arizona courts did not have jurisdiction to modify the Alabama child custody orders. As to whether the Arizona courts have jurisdiction to decide permanent custody of the children, the court reviews Arizona Revised Statute Section 25-331.

Under that statute, it was improper for the real parties in interest to attempt to invoke the jurisdiction of the Arizona courts after having obtained custody of the children by abducting them from Alabama and returning them to this state.

Arizona case law, embodied in the case of Application of Stone states “… except for the most compelling reasons the Arizona courts will not exercise jurisdiction to affect a custody decree, rendered by a sister state, having jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties thereto, where the party petitioning our courts for relief has wrongfully retained such custody in Arizona for the purpose of frustrating a sister state’s lawful decree.”

The Court concluded that Mrs. Ziglar acted improperly in asking the Arizona courts to rule on custody of children she abducted. Arizona courts will not exercise jurisdiction in this type of case. To do so would encourage kidnapping and contempt for court orders of another state.

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.


The Court of Appeals found that Arizona did not have jurisdiction to determine permanent custody of the two children. The lower court should have made this ruling. The Court ordered the lower court to restore custody of the two children to Mrs. Stuard.

If you have questions about modification of custody and child abduction in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona child custody and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in child custody and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona child custody or family law case around today.

Contact Form