Call Now(480)305-8300

Home » Visitation Rights and In Loco Parentis Standing in AZ | Hildebrand Law, PC

Visitation Rights and In Loco Parentis Standing in AZ | Hildebrand Law, PC

Posted on : December 3, 2016, By: Chris Hildebrand

Visitation Rights to a Person Standing In Loco Parentis to a Child in Arizona

Visitation Rights to a Person Standing In Loco Parentis to a Child in Arizona

When a child is born out of wedlock, a man who acknowledges paternity is presumed to be the child’s father. He is entitled to custody and visitation rights and is obligated to contribute to the support of his child. But when it is proved that he is not the biological father of the child, what rights and responsibilities exist?

The Arizona Court of Appeals considered these issues in Hughes v. Creighton, 798 P.2d 403 (1990).

Facts and Background

While Mrs. Creighton and Mr. Hughes dated, Mrs. Creighton became pregnant and named Mr. Hughes as the child’s father. He signed the birth certificate and acted as the boy’s father for 16 months. Mr. Hughes had a close relationship with and provided financial support for the child. The couple, however, did not marry.

After 16 months, the couple split up. Mrs. Creighton moved away with the boy and didn’t allow Mr. Hughes to see the child. She declared that Mr. Hughes was not the child’s father. Mr. Hughes filed a paternity action seeking visitation.

The court ordered blood tests, and they showed that Mr. Hughes was not the child’s natural father. The judge determined that Mr. Hughes, however, stood in locos parentis (i.e., in the role of a parent) to the child and found that visitation between Mr. Hughes and the child was in the child’s best interests.

The trial court also ruled it had no authority to order Mr. Hughes to pay child support. Mrs. Creighton and Mr. Hughes appeal from the rulings.

Learn About Visitation Rights to Someone In Loco Parentis to a Child in Arizona from Our Arizona Licensed Attorney Chris Hildebrand of Hildebrand Law, PC.

Jurisdiction to Award Visitation Rights to a Person Standing In Loco Parentis to a Child in Arizona

Mrs. Creighton claims that once the court found Mr. Hughes was not the boy’s biological father, it had no authority to order visitation. Mr. Hughes claims that since he stood in locos parentis, the court could grant visitation.

Mr. Hughes filed his action as a special paternity action. This law permits a man claiming to be a child’s father to seek custody and visitation rights after paternity is determined. However, he cannot seek custody or visitation under this statute if the paternity test is negative.

Another statute allows the “parent not granted custody” to seek reasonable visitation rights. However, “parent” here means biological or adoptive parents. Mr. Hughes is not the child’s biological or adoptive parent.

In Arizona, a court can order visitation for noncustodial parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and stepparents. Mr. Hughes did not fit any of those categories, even though he stood in locos parentis to the child.

He did not establish the child’s mother was an unfit parent to seek in loco parentis custody of the child. Absent a showing the child’s mother was unfit, Therefore, the lower court erred in awarding him visitation.

Jurisdiction to Award Child Support

Mr. Hughes argued that the court had the authority to order him to pay support. He bases this on the fact that he was found to be in loco parentis to the child.

However, Arizona law only allows a court to order biological or adoptive parents to pay child support. Only natural and adoptive parents are legally obligated to financially support their children. Since Mr. Hughes has no legal obligation to support the child, the court cannot order him to do so.

Disposition

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court order granting Mr. Hughes’s visitation. It affirmed the trial court’s ruling that it had no authority to order him to pay child support.

If you have questions about visitation rights and in loco parentis standing in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona child custody and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in child custody and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona child custody or family law case around today.

Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona

More Articles About Child Custody in Arizona

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about in loco parentis and child visitation rights in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.

As Seen on CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, and Fox News

Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys, PC As Seen in the News.

Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys, PC As Seen in the News.

What’s Hot – Blog

: Liability for a Spouse’s Debt in Arizona

: Failure to Appear for a Divorce Trial

: Is Community Liable for Separate Debt

: Community Property Lottery Winnings

: Income & Child Support Calculations

: Prenuptial Agreement and Creditors