Call Now(480)305-8300

Home » Change Circumstances to Change Custody in Arizona

Change Circumstances to Change Custody in Arizona

Posted on : April 20, 2016, By: Chris Hildebrand

Change in Child Custody in Arizona.

Change in Circumstances to Change Child Custody in Arizona

DUE TO COVID-19 AND OUR NEED TO ENSURE THE HEALTH OF OUR CLIENTS, ALL INITIAL CLIENT CONSULTATIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE. YOU MAY CALL US AT (480)305-8300 TO SCHEDULE A TELEPHONE CALL WITH ONE OF OUR EXPERIENCED FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS.

In Arizona, a parent must establish there has been a significant and recurring change in circumstances to modify a child custody order in Arizona before a court will do so. In Arizona, changing an order regarding legal decision making, parenting time and/or child support that is already in place requires that a Petition to Modify be filed.

Either party may request the modification. In considering such a request, the court must determine whether the filing the requested modification met his or her burden of proof of establishing a significant and continuing change in circumstances to justify modification of the order already in place.

In the unpublished Arizona Court of Appeals case of Boatley v. Mixon, the court found the parties were the parents of twin girls born in 2010. Previous proceedings had occurred in both the family court and the juvenile court regarding the parties’ children.

In October 2013, an order was issued in both the family court and juvenile court granting Mother visitation with the girls. At an evidentiary hearing regarding a petition Father filed to establish orders for legal decision making authority and parenting time, a report from a psychiatrist who evaluated Mother was considered by the court.

Learn About a Change in Circumstances Needed to Change Child Custody in Arizona from Our Arizona Licensed Attorney Chris Hildebrand of Hildebrand Law, PC.

The trial court affirmed Father’s sole legal decision making authority over the children and ordered Mother to have no contact with the children, Father or the children’s stepmother. In support of its decision, the family court cited the psychiatrist’s diagnosis of Mother with Antisocial Personality Disorder describing it as likely the condition would interfere with her ability to offer the children a “safe and secure environment.”

The court also noted that the psychiatrist was of the belief that Mother was not likely to demonstrate minimally adequate parenting skills, and that a child in her care would be at risk for abuse. One of the twins died a tragic death after which Mother filed a petition to modify legal decision making, parenting and child support.

She stated that her daughter’s death was due to a lack of medical care and false reporting of her well being. She alleged that her surviving daughter was in danger due to Father’s and stepmother’s “criminal and domestic violence backgrounds.”

The court sought additional information from the Phoenix Police Department as well as the Department of Child Safety (DCS) after which the court dismissed the petition. The court concluded that while the death of one of the children was tragic, there was no basis for the court to attribute the child’s death to misconduct on the part of Father or stepmother or that the remaining child in their care was seriously endangered.

The trial court also noted serious concerns regarding the mental stability of the Mother and her ability to care for the parties’ child. For these reasons, the court dismissed Mother’s petition. Mother appealed.

Change In Circumstances and the One Year Year in Arizona

On appeal, Mother raised a number of arguments that were not related to the dismissal of her petition for modification. As the review on appeal is limited to the rulings specified in the notice of appeal, those issues were disregarded by the Arizona Court of Appeals.

The Arizona Court of Appeals reviewed the requirements of A.R.S. Section 25-411(A), which prohibits filing a motion to modify a legal decision-making or parenting time decree earlier than one year after the legal decision-making order was issued, unless there is reason to believe the present environment of the minor child leaves them in serious danger.

Mother’s petition was filed only six months after the previous order was issued and included only general allegations about Father without any supporting evidence. Claims that the deceased child did not receive adequate medical care appear to be contradicted by medical records attached to the petition that state the child was admitted to the hospital with “sickle cell crisis” and there were “no abuse concerns, no…neglect.”

If you need information about changed circumstances to change child custody in Arizona, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in child custody cases in Arizona.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona child custody case around today.

Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona

More Articles About Child Custody in Arizona

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about a change in circumstances to modify child custody orders in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.

Related Blogs – What’s Hot

: Stock Holdings and Interest on Debt

: Failure to Appear for a Divorce Trial

: Community Property Lottery Winnings

: Income & Child Support Calculations

: Community Interest in a Business

: Nontestamentary Dispositions of Assets