Domestic Violence Presumption in Arizona Child Custody Cases
DUE TO COVID-19 AND OUR NEED TO ENSURE THE HEALTH OF OUR CLIENTS, ALL INITIAL CLIENT CONSULTATIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE. YOU MAY CALL US AT (480)305-8300 TO SCHEDULE A TELEPHONE CALL WITH ONE OF OUR EXPERIENCED FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS.
We want to talk to you about what is known as the domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases. To start, we are going to discuss what the domestic violence presumption is in an Arizona child custody case by discussing the Arizona Court of Appeals’ decision on that issue in the case of Deluna v. Petitto.
We will then discuss how the domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases switches the burden of proof from the abused parent to the abuser to prove why joint legal decision making is in the best interests of the children despite the existence of domestic violence.
As part of that discussion, we will show you why it does not matter, for purposes of the domestic violence presumption, whether the domestic violence was considered by the court to be a significant act of domestic violence or, although still domestic violence, a less significant act of domestic violence.
Defining the Domestic Violence Presumption in Arizona Child Custody Cases
Arizona law requires the court to make a domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases if it determines a parent has engaged in domestic violence.
The domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases requires the abusive parent to prove that joint legal custody of a child is in the child’s best interests.
In its published decision in Deluna v. Petitto, — P.3d —, 2019 WL 4197236 (App.2019) the Court of Appeals explained the appropriate procedure the court must follow when examining domestic violence in family law cases.
Deluna involved a married couple with three children.
Before their marriage in 2016, Father was arrested in 2013 after he committed an act of domestic violence by assaulting Mother and her daughter from a previous relationship.
Mother did not cooperate in the prosecution and the charges were dismissed.
After the parties separated in 2017, Mother obtained an order of protection against Father, which he then violated.
Mother filed for divorce and at trial, the Court found that although Father had committed domestic violence, it was not “significant domestic violence” under A.R.S. § 25-403.03(A), and Father was not precluded from joint legal decision-making authority and parenting time.
Domestic Violence Presumption Switches the Burden of Proof to the Abuser
On appeal, Mother argued that she proved significant domestic violence, but even if the court determined it was not significant, the court erred by failing to apply the domestic violence presumption in her Arizona child custody case pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-403.03(D).
That statute requires a finding that awarding joint legal decision-making authority to a parent who has committed any act of domestic violence is contrary to the child’s best interests.
The Court of Appeals agreed and found the court failed to apply the factors listed in A.R.S. § 25-403.03(E) to determine whether Father rebutted the presumption that joint legal decision making was not in the child’s best interests, after finding domestic violence had occurred.
The Court of Appeals then explained analysis that must take place in an Arizona child custody case when reviewing the issue of domestic violence.
If the court determines there has been significant domestic violence, joint legal decision-making, meaning joint legal custody, is precluded as a matter of law.
However, if the court finds any domestic violence, A.R.S. § 25-403.03(D) creates a rebuttable presumption and the court must make specific findings under A.R.S. § 25-403.03(E) to determine whether the presumption has been rebutted in a child custody case in Arizona.
Factors That Need to Be Considered When Rebutting the Domestic Violence Presumption
Mother also argued that the court erred by awarding parenting time to Father without conducting the analysis required by A.R.S. § 25-403.03(F).
The Court of Appeals agreed and ruled that because the court concluded that Father had committed domestic violence, it was required to explicitly determine whether Father had shown that parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child’s emotional development.
The court erred by failing to make specific findings explaining its reasoning and conclusions when it awarded parenting time to Father.
Summary of the domestic violence presumption in Arizona
If a court determines an act of domestic violence has occurred in an Arizona child custody case, the judge must first determine if the act of domestic violence was significant or not. If the act of domestic violence is found to be a significant act of domestic violence, a judge is precluded by law from granting the parents joint legal decision making over their children. The abused parent will, therefore, receive sole custody of the children.
To the contrary, if the court determines an act of domestic violence occurred but concludes that the act of domestic violence was not significant, the court is not immediately precluded from granting the parents joint legal custody of their children. Instead, the burden of proof shifts to the abuser to prove an award of joint legal custody is in the children’s best interests, pursuant to all of the factors set forth in Arizona revised statute section § 25-403.03(E).
Once the court has reviewed the evidence, a judge is required to state its findings as to each statutory factor to justify why either the abuser did not prove joint legal decision making is in the children’s best interest or, alternatively, why the abuser did overcome the domestic violence presumption that joint legal decision making is not in the children’s best interests when a parent commits an act of domestic violence against the other parent.
Arizona Attorneys for Domestic Violence Presumption Child Custody Cases
If you have questions about domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona child custody and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in child custody and family law cases.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona child custody or family law case around today.
Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona
More Articles About Child Custody in Arizona
- Access to a Child’s Medical Records in Arizona
- Adoption Attorneys in Arizona
- Required Affidavit in a Child Custody Case in Arizona
- Are Mothers Favored Custody Battles in Arizona
- Arizona Child Custody Attorneys
- Arizona Child Custody Statutes
- Arizona Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act Statutes
- Changing a Child’s Last Name in Arizona
- Changing Child Custody in Arizona
- Child Custody and Child Support in Arizona
- Child Custody In Arizona
- Child Custody Laws in Arizona
- Child Custody Rights in Arizona
- Co-Parenting After Divorce in Arizona
- Custody of a Child to Grandparent in Arizona
- Delegation of Custody Decisions in Arizona
- Divorce and Grandparents Visitation in Arizona
- Effective Co-Parenting in Arizona
- Emergency Child Custody in Arizona
- Emergency Child Custody Orders in Arizona
- Enforce Parenting Time or Custody in Arizona
- Enforce Visitation Non-Custodial Parent in Arizona
- Grandparent’s Rights in Arizona
- How is Child Custody Determined in Arizona
- How to Change a Child’s Last Name in Arizona
- How to Enforce Parenting Time in Arizona
- How to Get Sole Custody in Arizona
- How to Modify Child Custody in Arizona
- How to Modify Visitation in Arizona
- Joint Custody and School Decisions in Arizona
- Joint Custody vs Sole Custody Arizona
- Joint Legal Custody or Joint Decision Making in Arizona
- Modifying Visitation With a Child in Arizona
- Moving Children Many Times in Arizona
- Order of Protection and Child Custody in Arizona
- Parent Information Program Class in Arizona
- Parent Move Out of State With A Child From Arizona
- Parental Alienation in Arizona
- Prepare for Child Custody Evaluation in Arizona
- Presumption of Equal Parenting Time in Arizona
- Restrictions in Arizona on Taking Children to Another Country
- Sole Legal Custody or Sole Decision Making in Arizona
- Sole or Joint Custody in Arizona
- Temporary Child Custody in Arizona
- Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act in Arizona
- What Are the Child Custody Factors in Arizona
- What Determines Child Custody in Arizona
- What is a Child Custody Evaluation in Arizona
- What is a Parenting Coordinator in an Arizona Child Custody Case
- What Is Domestic Violence in Arizona
- What Types of Child Custody Are There in Arizona
- What Visitation or Parenting Time Schedules do Judges Order in Arizona
- Who Has Custody of Children When a Divorce is Filed in Arizona
- Who Is the Best Child Custody Lawyer in Arizona
- Withholding Child From Custodial Parent in Arizona
- Contesting Relocation of a Child When You Do Not Live in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about the domestic violence presumption in Arizona child custody cases to ensure everyone has access to information about child custody law in Arizona. Chris is a family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a child custody case should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and actually caring about what his clients are going through.