Liability for a Spouse’s Negligence in Arizona
You may be asking yourself am I liable for my spouse’s’ car accident or negligence? In Jones v Weaver, 123 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1941), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals considered this question: Is a husband personally responsible for the negligence of his wife who caused a fatal accident?
Facts of the Case
.Mr. Jones and his wife took a road trip from California. The car, purchased with the couple’s joint money, was held in the name of husband and registered to him. When they were in Arizona, the husband was asleep in the back of the car and his wife was driving. She hit another car, killing herself and two other people.
The police determined that Mr. Jones’s wife caused the accident. The estates of both of the deceased sued her husband. Each one obtained a jury verdict in the amount of $10,000 against him. Mr. Jones appealed both and the Court heard the two appeals together.
Car as Community Property in Arizona
The husband claims that Arizona law applies since the accident happened in Arizona. Under Arizona law, a car purchased with joint money is community property of the couple. When one spouse is driving, she is acting as the agent of the community, not her spouse. Therefore, any damages must be claimed against the community, not the spouse.
In Donn v. Kunz, 79 P.2d 965, the Arizona court reviewed a similar case. In that case, a wife’s negligent driving of a community car caused injuries to third persons. It found that any damages were a community debt. Since the community expired when the wife died, it was not possible to hold the husband liable.
The 9th Circuit noted that the community, in Arizona, is a separate entity apart from the husband and wife. It was upon this basis that the Donn v. Kunz court determined that the husband could not be individually liable.
California Law Applies, Not Arizona Law
But does Arizona law apply? The 9th Circuit Court cited a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling on that issue. It said that in cases between citizens of different states, federal courts must follow the conflict-of-laws rules in the state where the court sits. In this case, the federal district courts hearing the cases sat in Arizona. Therefore, Arizona law determined conflict of laws issues.
In Arizona, the character of property acquired during a marriage is determined by the law of the couple’s residence. The District Courts, then, were obliged to look to California to determine the ownership of the automobile involved in the accident. California does not recognize any legal entity separate and distinct from the spouses. In California, the husband is given the entire management and control of community personal property.
Because of that, the Court held that the decision in Donn v. Kunz does not apply to this case. Instead, the “family car doctrine” of Arizona applies. Under that doctrine, the husband is individually liable for the negligence of his wife in driving the family automobile.
The 9th Circuit Court considered and rejected a handful of other issues before affirming the jury verdicts below.
If you need information about a spouse’s liability for a spouse’s negligence in Arizona, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce cases in Arizona.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce case around today.
Other Articles About Community Property in Arizona
- Community Lien on Sole and Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Lien in Arizona
- Community Liens Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Property and Personal Guaranty in Arizona
- Determining Community Versus Sole Property in Arizona
- The difference Between Community and Separate Property in Arizona
- Disclaimer Deed in a Divorce in Arizona
- Divide Retirement Accounts in an Arizona Divorce
- Dividing Property Not Included in Divorce Decree in Arizona
- Division of Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Do Rules Regarding Property Apply to Debts in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforce Division of Property and Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforcing a Property Settlement Agreement in Arizona
- Filing a Lis Pendens in a Divorce in Arizona
- How is Property Divided in a Divorce in Arizona
- How to Divide Property in Arizona When a Spouse is Hiding Assets
- Is All Property Community Property in Arizona
- Is Arizona a 50 50 State in a Divorce
- Is Separate Property Divided in Arizona Divorce
- Marital Property Laws in Arizona
- Military Retirement Pay and Divorce in Arizona
- Pensions and Divorce in Arizona
- Separate Property Used to Purchase a Home During Marriage in Arizona
- Sole and Separate Property Divorce Arizona
- Is a Spouse Liable for Credit Card Debt in Arizona
- Stock Options Divided in an Arizona Divorce Case
- Stock Options in an Arizona Divorce
- Unequal Division of Property in Arizona Divorce
- Unfair Separation Agreement in Arizona
- Valuation and Distribution Options For Pensions in an Arizona Divorce
- What is Community Property in Arizona
- What is Separate Property in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about liability for a spouse’s negligence in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.