Result of Commingling Community and Separate Property in Arizona
Under Arizona law, when one spouse earns income from separate property, that income is usually considered separate property. However, if the spouse does not keep them separate from community funds, the court can treat them as community property.
In Franklin v. Franklin 253 P.2d 337 (1953) the Arizona Supreme Court addressed this issue.
Facts of the Case
Mrs. Franklin and Mr. Franklin married in 1917. Fred worked on the railroad and his wife had separate funds from an inheritance. However, she did not keep these funds separate and apart from community funds.
During the marriage, the couple bought a house in Tucson from the wife’s father and paid for it with her inheritance. Mr. Franklin signed a quitclaim on it in favor of Mrs. Franklin. She received about $14,000 in rents from it during the marriage but commingled the amounts with community funds.
The couple used community funds to buy a building in Gila Bend (worth $500) and property on Fort Lowell Road. They improved both of these properties during the marriage.
In the divorce, the court awarded the Tucson house to Mrs. Franklin as her separate property. It gave each spouse a 50% interest in the Fort Lowell Road property. It gave the Gila Bend property to Mr. Franklin. It awarded wife a promissory note given by her sister when the couple lent her money. From this property division, wife appeals.
[arve url=”https://vimeo.com/148142944″ thumbnail=”4031″ title=”Commingling Separate Property With Community Property in Arizona.” description=”Learn About Commingling Separate Property With Community Property in Arizona from Our Arizona Licensed Attorney Chris Hildebrand of Hildebrand Law, PC.” upload_date=”2019-02-07″ duration=”1M7S” maxwidth=”640″ /]
Status of Income from Separate Property
In Arizona, income earned from the separate rental property of one spouse is usually separate property. However, sometimes the spouse mixes the separate funds with community funds. If the funds are so mixed that it’s impossible to segregate them, the court treats all as community funds.
Here, wife made no attempt to segregate or keep track of her separate funds. The husband worked or received disability pay during the entire marriage and Mrs. Franklin intermixed their funds. Therefore, the trial court was correct in treating the Gila Bend and the Fort Lowell Road property as community property.
Alimony and Grandchild Support
The trial court denied Bernice’s request for alimony. The Supreme Court said that this was within its discretion since she had income from the Tucson property.
The trial court also denied the wife’s request for support for the couple’s grandchild. They had been taking care of the child as its de facto parents. However, the child’s father was alive and could take care of the child financially.
The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the trial court decision.
If you need information about what happens when you combine community property with separate property in Arizona, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce cases in Arizona.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce case around today.
Other Articles About Community Property in Arizona
- Community Lien on Sole and Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Lien in Arizona
- Community Liens Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Property and Personal Guaranty in Arizona
- Determining Community Versus Sole Property in Arizona
- The difference Between Community and Separate Property in Arizona
- Disclaimer Deed in a Divorce in Arizona
- Divide Retirement Accounts in an Arizona Divorce
- Dividing Property Not Included in Divorce Decree in Arizona
- Division of Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Do Rules Regarding Property Apply to Debts in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforce Division of Property and Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforcing a Property Settlement Agreement in Arizona
- Filing a Lis Pendens in a Divorce in Arizona
- How is Property Divided in a Divorce in Arizona
- How to Divide Property in Arizona When a Spouse is Hiding Assets
- Is All Property Community Property in Arizona
- Is Arizona a 50 50 State in a Divorce
- Is Separate Property Divided in Arizona Divorce
- Marital Property Laws in Arizona
- Military Retirement Pay and Divorce in Arizona
- Pensions and Divorce in Arizona
- Separate Property Used to Purchase a Home During Marriage in Arizona
- Sole and Separate Property Divorce Arizona
- Is a Spouse Liable for Credit Card Debt in Arizona
- Stock Options Divided in an Arizona Divorce Case
- Stock Options in an Arizona Divorce
- Unequal Division of Property in Arizona Divorce
- Unfair Separation Agreement in Arizona
- Valuation and Distribution Options For Pensions in an Arizona Divorce
- What is Community Property in Arizona
- What is Separate Property in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about commingling separate property with community property in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.