Can a Military Spouse Protect Against a Reduction in Military Retirement Benefits From a Survivor Benefit Election
A person in the military may earn a military retirement that may be divided between spouses in divorce in Arizona.
The question is can a military spouse protect against a reduction in military retirement benefits awarded to that spouse in divorce in Arizona.
Survivor elections and reduction of a spouse’s share of military retirement in an Arizona divorce are not unusual to occur well after a divorce. As an example, suppose a couple gets divorced.
The wife is in the military and the husband is not in the military.
Wife is eligible to return at some point in the future but after the spouses’ divorce.
The court will award the husband a portion of the retirement benefits pursuant to the terms of the divorce decree.
Let’s say the amount husband will receive after all the calculations are done is $500.00 every month and the wife receives $1,000.00 every month after the service member retires.
However, after the divorce Wife remarried and has chosen a survivor benefit election that guarantees her current husband will continue to receive her monthly retirement benefits if she passes away.
Wife’s decision to choose the survivor benefit election will necessarily reduce the amount both she and her former husband receive every month.
The former husband may be reduced to $450.00 per month and the wife’s monthly retirement payment may reduce to $900.00 per month.
There are also other reasons the expected monthly payment to both spouses may be reduced from what was expected at the time of the divorce, such as a spouse converting their military retirement to military disability pay.
Federal Law Prohibits a Divorce Judge From Making an Adjustment for a Survivor Benefit Election
The question then becomes whether a judge in the original divorce decree orders the military spouse to pay their former spouse the difference between the original monthly amount and the reduced about.
In our example, the Husband’s original expected amount from the divorce was to be $500.00 and the reduced amount was $450.00.
Can the military spouse be ordered to pay the non-military spouse the $50.00 difference because the military spouse voluntarily and intentionally decreased the amount both spouses receive from the retirement by choosing a survivor benefit election or converting some or all of their military retirement to military disability pay after the divorce?
The short answer is no.
The Arizona Court of Appeals in a published decision in the case of Barron vs. Barron addressed this issue.
That court held that federal law controls in this situation.
Federal law specifically provides that the amount of military retirement pay that can be treated as community property in a divorce does not include amounts deducted when a survivor benefit election is later chosen after a divorce.
If you have questions about survivor elections and military reduction of retirement in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona community propert and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in community property and family law cases.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona community property or family law case around today.
Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona
More Articles About Arizona Community Property Laws
- Community Lien on Sole and Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Lien in Arizona
- Community Liens Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Property and Personal Guaranty in Arizona
- Determining Community Versus Sole Property in Arizona
- The difference Between Community and Separate Property in Arizona
- Disclaimer Deed in a Divorce in Arizona
- Divide Retirement Accounts in an Arizona Divorce
- Dividing Property Not Included in Divorce Decree in Arizona
- Division of Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Do Rules Regarding Property Apply to Debts in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforce Division of Property and Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforcing a Property Settlement Agreement in Arizona
- Filing a Lis Pendens in a Divorce in Arizona
- How is Property Divided in a Divorce in Arizona
- How to Divide Property in Arizona When a Spouse is Hiding Assets
- Is All Property Community Property in Arizona
- Is Arizona a 50 50 State in a Divorce
- Is Separate Property Divided in Arizona Divorce
- Marital Property Laws in Arizona
- Military Retirement Pay and Divorce in Arizona
- Pensions and Divorce in Arizona
- Separate Property Used to Purchase a Home During Marriage in Arizona
- Sole and Separate Property Divorce Arizona
- Is a Spouse Liable for Credit Card Debt in Arizona
- Stock Options Divided in an Arizona Divorce Case
- Stock Options in an Arizona Divorce
- Unequal Division of Property in Arizona Divorce
- Unfair Separation Agreement in Arizona
- Valuation and Distribution Options For Pensions in an Arizona Divorce
- What is Community Property in Arizona
- What is Separate Property in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about survivorship elections in military retirements to ensure everyone has access to information about military retirement and family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case.