Skip to Content
Hildebrand Law, P.C. mobile logo

Categories

Military Retirement Payments in an AZ Divorce | Hildebrand Law, PC

Thu 4th Aug, 2016 Arizona Community Property Laws

Oftentimes a spouse earns retirement benefits as part of their job compensation. In Arizona, those benefits are considered community property. But, how is that calculated? In Czarnecki v. Czarnecki, 600 P.2d 1110 (1978) the Arizona Court of Appeals addressed this question.

Facts of the Case

Mrs. Czarnecki filed for a divorce from Mr. Czarnecki in 1973. Mr. Czarnecki retired from the military that same year and received retirement benefits. The wife asked for the court to divide the retirement as community property. The husband admitted in a verified answer that the retirement account was community property.

The court entered a divorce in 1973. It did not divide the property in that decree. However, it entered the second decree in 1974, disposing of all property except the retirement benefits. It amended the decree again only a few months later, without mentioning the retirement benefits. This decree was amended yet again by a decree filed on May 15, 1974. Neither of the decrees entered in 1974 referred to the military retirement benefits.

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

The issue remains with the husband’s retirement plan; is it his separate property or community’s property?

In 1975, Mr. Czarnecki petitioned the court to terminate Mrs. Czarnecki’s spousal maintenance since she had remarried. She responded, asking the court to divide the retirement pay.

The court held a trial on the matter in 1975. It took evidence on where the couple lived prior to Arizona, without objection. It ruled that all of the retirement benefits were Mr. Czarnecki’s separate property. From this ruling, the wife appeals.

Admission in Pleading

The wife argued that the husband could not deny that 100% of the military retirement benefits were community property. He had admitted this in his verified answer to the complaint. The Court agreed that a verified admission prevents that party from presenting a counter-argument. However, the other party waives the admission if they fail to object and allow evidence to be heard at trial on the matter.

In this case, the husband’s attorney allowed evidence to be heard of where the couple had lived in Arizona. The court said it wanted to determine the community property portion of the retirement pay. The wife failed to object to the questions and thus waived the admission.

The Court of Appeals found that 35% of the retirement pay was actually community property. It then awarded Mrs. Czarnecki half of that.

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.

Distinguishing McClellon v. McClellon, 464 P.2d 982 (1970)

Mr. Czarnecki argued that the court had the right to award him 100% of the retirement pay. It cited the McClellon v. McClellon case in support. In that case, the Court did not award the wife a one-half interest in the accounts receivable of her husband. It ruled that this would make it impossible for him to pay child support and alimony.

The Court of Appeals said that the record, in this case, does not support a similar conclusion. Mr. Czarnecki’s only family obligation is a child support payment of $375 per month. His retirement pay is $1,035 per month. In addition, he is a college graduate with a master’s degree and a teaching certificate.

The Court also said that retirement benefits are different in nature from accounts receivable of a business, which was at issue in the McClellon case. For those reasons, it rejected the husband’s argument.

The Court awarded the wife 50% of the community portion of the retirement. The Arizona Court of Appeals reversed the judgment below. It remanded the case to the trial court. It ordered the court to determine the community interest in the husband’s retirement pay and award wife one-half of that interest.

The Arizona Court of Appeals distinguished this case from its prior ruling in the McClellan v. McClellan case.

If you need information about military retirement payments in an Arizona divorce, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce cases in Arizona.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce case around today.

Contact Form

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.