Skip to Content
Hildebrand Law, P.C. mobile logo

Child Support and Assets in Arizona | Hildebrand Law, PC

Tue 22nd Dec, 2015 Arizona Child Support Laws

Some people want to know if there is a relationship between child support and assets in Arizona. We wanted to share the Arizona Court of Appeals’ decision on that issue in the case of Jenkins v. Jenkins.

Arizona family court utilizes a standard calculation based on the income of both parties and parenting time awarded to both parties to determine child support awards and amounts. In some cases, one or both of the parties involved will experience a significant change in their financial status for a variety of reasons.

If such a change can be shown to be “substantial and continuing” the court can approve a petition requesting a child support modification that coincides with the change in financial status.

In the case of Jenkins v. Jenkins (Thomas P. Jenkins, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Beverly Dawn Jenkins, Respondent-Appellant), the dissolution of marriage included an order for child support to be paid by the husband to the wife.

U.S. News and World Report Votes Hildebrand Law, PC Best Law Firms for 2020 2021 2022 2023

Affect of Income from Assets on Child Support in Arizona

Within the Decree, it was noted that calculations used for child support did not include any income from potential interest in property, but also noted that if the property was to be sold and the sale price invested in interest-bearing accounts, it could be appropriate for the court to impute income to the father as a result of the investment of the funds.

Neither party appealed the original ruling. Within a month of receiving the final decree, the husband sold the property valued at approximately $7,000,000. (The property was inherited from his mother prior to the marriage and was designated in the premarital agreement as his sole and separate property). After the sale of the property, the father entered into an agreement with a reputable financial institution to facilitate a 1031 Exchange.

According to the 1031 agreement, the father received no capital gains from the transaction nor any actual income. The condition of the agreement prevented access to the funds and required that they are used to purchase “like” properties within 180 days of the sale of the original property.

After the sale of the property, the mother in the case filed a petition for modification of child support requesting that the sale price of the property and its “potential” earnings be considered as income that the father is refusing. She referenced previous decisions regarding ex-spouses who purposefully do not exercise stock options or fail to meet their own earning potential in order to minimize the “income” considered for child support calculations.

The family court denied the mother’s request for a modification of child support. The appellate court affirms the decision of the trial court, finding that the appreciation in the value of the father’s sole and separate property is not typically considered income for purposes of calculating child support.

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.

The appellate court fails to see how the mother demonstrated a substantial and continuing change in circumstance in comparison to the original Decree (which neither party appealed) due to the fact that at the time of the original decree, the husband earned $74, 650 per year and at the time of the modification, evidence was submitted that the husband’s earnings were estimated at $74,305 per year.

Also at the time of the original Decree, the husband was a farmer and owned $7 million worth of land. At the time of the modification, the father was a farmer and owned $7 million worth of land. The Court of Appeals of Arizona finds that the mother failed to demonstrate how this constitutes a substantial and continuing change in circumstance such as is required to obtain a modification of child support. The appellate court affirms the ruling of the family court by denying mother a modification of child support.

If things are not going well in your Arizona child support case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona child support and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in child support and family law cases.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona child support or family law case around today.

Contact Form

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.