Logo
Call Now(480)305-8300

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona

Posted on : February 20, 2018, By:  Christopher Hildebrand
What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

The Short Answer

The short answer to the question of what date does a court use to establish a change in circumstances to modify spousal maintenance in Arizona is the date the original spousal maintenance orders were issued in a divorce decree or decree of legal separation and not as to any subsequent dates that spousal maintenance order had been modified. Learn  more about hte Arizona Court of Appeals decision in the case of McClendon vs. McClendon below.

The Long Answer

The clients, in this case, are S.L. McClendon (“Wife”) and C.P. McClendon (“Husband”). The couple entered a consent decree ending their marriage in 2007 after being married 30 years. At that time, Husband was employed as a city manager in AZ. No employment for Wife was indicated. Within the consent decree, Wife would receive, until the further agreement, spousal maintenance of $5500 per month and when Husband retired, she would receive her share of Husband’s retirement that had accrued during their marriage. Note that there was nothing written into the consent decree indicating a length of time Wife would receive the spousal maintenance.

Discussion of the Date to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

Husband retired in AZ, in February of 2014 and moved to California to accept another city manager position. At this time, Husband petitioned to modify the spousal maintenance amount. Wife was now working full time and also receiving her share of Husband’s Arizona retirement. Within six months of Husband’s February 2014 petition, both parties entered into a binding Rule 69 agreement, which is a settlement between parties in a family law case. This means that “the agreement is final and the Court will not change it unless one party can prove that there is a defect in the agreement.” A defect would be a number of reasons why the agreement was not fair to one party or the other. At this time, Husband’s spousal maintenance obligation was reduced to $4000 per month, though the length of time the spousal maintenance would continue was indefinite.

After approximately two years had passed, in 2016, Husband once again petitioned to modify the spousal maintenance obligation. Husband testified at the evidentiary hearing that though Wife only worked part-time prior to the divorce in 2007, she had been working full-time since before the 2014 agreement and had received a raise which provided her with a monthly wage of $2900 per month. Wife had also started receiving her share of Husband’s retirement prior to the 2014 order which was in the amount of approximately $3400 per month. Husband’s portion of his Arizona retirement was approximately $5600 per month, and his California wages were approximately $20,000 per month.

Jennifer, thank you for being my attorney. I could not have been more pleased with the outcome of my family court hearing. Everything you have done for me throughout this case reflects in the final ruling of the judge. You helped me keep my head together and taught me a lot about myself as a person. I learned so much about my life from observing and listening to you. I will take all the advice you gave me to continue taking responsibility for my choices, continue to put the kids' needs first, and always stay truthful. Your diligence, dedication, and persistence in my case made what seemed impossible, possible. You are a wonderful person and an amazing attorney and I am stronger and more confident because of you.
A Google User
A Google User
20:31 20 Sep 17
I just want to again thank the Firm for working with me all that it has. I could not have done anything without everyone's assistance. You, Chris and Stacey have been and continue to provide me with compassion and hard work towards my case. Also a very special thanks to Kip for taking my case in the beginning. Also continued support from him and his dedication to providing me with his expertise in this matter.
A Google User
A Google User
21:41 07 Nov 17
After interviewing several law firms, I came across Jennifer Shick, and her firm, who I hired to represent me for my Family Court case. Jennifer has extensive knowledge of the law and is determined to bring the truth to every issue involved within the case. Throughout my case, Jennifer was prepared meticulously as well as went above and beyond all of my expectations. Even when the other party tried to differ from the truth, lie to the Judge, and turn situations around, Jennifer remained attentive and provided substantial evidence to show the judge the facts as well as the proof to support what was the best interests of my children. Additionally, Jennifer helped me endure many difficult experiences, situations and inspired me to remain positive throughout the entirety of my case. Her kindness, compassion, and professionalism helped me through very difficult times and made the process feel a thousand times lighter on my shoulders. She truly has my children and my best interest at heart and I trust her perspective as well as her honesty on each and every aspect of my case. She lessened the burden on my shoulders and even when I felt like the case was not going to go in my favor, Jennifer was open-minded and reassured me that the Judge would, in fact, see the truth, which he did and the case went in my favor. After nine months of court, everything finally came together. I cannot declare how much Jennifer has been an outstanding attorney. She addressed each and every issue with diligence, she cares about her clients and their families. Jennifer genuinely cares about her clients and her dedication to the details of the case was remarkable. Overall, I am extremely pleased with Jennifer’s services and I am truly thankful that I was so blessed to have her represent my children and me. I highly recommend Jennifer as one of the best attorneys in Arizona and if the situation ever arises, I will definitely have her represent my children and me again.
Google User
Google User
14:58 04 Oct 17
Dear Stacey and Kip, How can I ever thank you enough for helping me through the most difficult time in my life? I couldn't put into words my heartfelt gratefulness. You both were so compassionate and professional at every given moment throughout this process with me. I thank you from the bottom of my heart. You helped me to regain my freedom.
A Google User
A Google User
16:03 22 Nov 17
I was a client of Attorney Kevin Park for the dissolution of a divorce in 2016. And since I had never had the need to hire an attorney before for any purpose, I was somewhat apprehensive of the process. But the very calm and professional demeanor of Mr. Park eased my fears. He adeptly answered all my questions and I clearly knew the process and what to expect. And the skilled manner he communicated with opposing counsel was perfect. When it came down to negotiating with my spouse’s counsel, I knew I had selected the best attorney for my situation. What I noticed and appreciated was that he was using just the right amount of pressure with opposing counsel as was necessary. If you find yourself in this situation, you will want a seasoned professional like Mr. Park on your side. I'm very grateful that he was my attorney and not the opposition!
A Google User
A Google User
22:14 28 Jun 17
Chris is a smart and aggressive attorney for his clients. Chris always tries to reach a fair settlement of his cases. I’ve represented clients when Chris was the opposing counsel and while he is professional and amicable to work with, he does not back off on what he needs to do for his client
A Google User
A Google User
18:16 18 Sep 17
Kevin Park of Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys was just what I needed for my divorce. He was very approachable and personable. He was quick to recognize what I needed and provided it quickly and efficiently. I hope to never need a divorce lawyer again, but if I know anyone else who does, I will definitely recommend Kevin.
A Google User
A Google User
19:22 23 Aug 17
I feel that Tracey Van Wickler is certainly one of the best family lawyers around. She is logical, intelligent, and truly cares. Tracey always does what is in the clients best interest, does it well, timely and with integrity. She is good at keeping her clients informed as to what is going on and clear in her communication both written and verbally. I have recommended Tracey to other people and will continue to recommend her. I recommended Tracey to someone who was having issues with their ex-wife and his response was, “I know how good she is because I went up against her and she ate me for lunch”. This same person was so impressed with her, he even recommended her to someone else, WOW, that is impressive! I am exceptionally happy with her attention to detail, her ability to explain things in ways that are easy to understand, as well as her ability to keep everyone focused on the most important things. I would recommend Tracey to anyone who may be in need of her services.
A Google User
A Google User
17:44 23 Jun 16
I retained Hildebrand Law after interview a number of firms in the valley. Working with Michael C. was incredibly easy and informative. My case progressed in such a organized and thought out way to ensure that my needs were met. Michael was incredibly proactive and was able to see far ahead into my case to steer clear of some roadblocks. I would not hesitate to recommend Michael Clancy, and Hildebrand Law in general, to anyone.
Bassam Ziadeh
Bassam Ziadeh
21:20 02 Apr 18
I have worked with Hildebrand law for about 8 years. They are always ready to serve, provide guidance and give you a few options. When they provide you options they also take the time to walk you through the pros and cons of each and give you a recommendation of what is best, but will listen to you and support whatever course you choose after making and educated choice. I’d recommend them to my closest friends and feel Chris Hildebrand is now a friend to me.
Larry Flint
Larry Flint
21:53 27 Feb 18
Despite the unfortunate situation I found myself in, Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law helped me maneuver every step with professionalism, expertise, and even a sensitivity that was an added bonus.Chris and his staff helped me even when I didn't know I needed the help. In other words. . . they made sure we did not leave anything undone. And in the rare instance we needed the expertise of another professional, Chris knew exactly who to recommend.Chris also knew, because of his experience, what to anticipate down the road of litigation. That meant we were better prepared to meet the challenges head on, which lead to a more equitable and fair outcome. I appreciated that Chris did his best to meet my every need in a timely fashion, even if I had a simple question that required only a phone call or e-mail or if we needed to talk face-to-face.I highly recommend Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law, PC.
Sam Franchimone
Sam Franchimone
22:09 12 Sep 13

The court ruled in the 2016 order that the time frame in question should start from the original consent decree in 2007 to present and not from the 2014 Order to present. Spousal maintenance was modified from $4000 per month to $2000 per month and the court also ordered the spousal maintenance to terminate in 12 months. The court also denied Wife’s request for attorney’s fees. The orders were based on A.R.S. § 25-319 findings which protect a spouse for a variety of reasons by granting spousal maintenance. In this case, the wife was initially in need of that protection, but Husband insisted that Wife had since become self-sufficient. Wife appealed.

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

What Date Does a Court Use to Establish a Change in Circumstances to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona?

Discussing the Facts on the Date to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona

Wife insisted that the superior court erred in three ways. First, she argued that the court used the original 2007 Consent Decree to base the new orders on, instead of the 2014 Modification Order. In order for Husband to modify the spousal maintenance, it would be necessary for him to prove a substantial and continuing change existed to support that modification. If the court used the original 2007 Order, Husband could show that a change existed. Wife argued that if the court used the 2014 Order, no substantial and continuing changes existed to support the modification of that order. According to A.R.S. § 25-327(A), the burden of proving changed circumstances is on the party seeking modification and the party cannot use the same circumstances to support a successive modification. Therefore, the 2007 Order was used to modify the spousal support in 2014 and could not be used again to modify the spousal support in 2016. As § 25-327 does not provide any specific point in time from which to assess the ”changed circumstances” in this case the superior court concluded that “the relevant time period for assessing change is the time from dissolution {2007} to present, not from {2014} to present.” Secondly, Wife argued that the court erred when they technically terminated the spousal maintenance by ordering a deadline of only 12 more months of spousal support following the 2016 Order. Since the parties had entered into a binding Rule 69 agreement in 2014, and as of yet Husband had not proven a changed circumstance that was substantial and continuing, the spousal maintenance could not legally be terminated. Thirdly, Wife reiterated her request for attorney fees. She argued that since the court had erred in their 2016 Orders, she should not be denied the attorney’s fees she is entitled to.

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.

Hildebrand Law, PC | Voted Best of Our Valley in Arizona Foothills Magazine.

The Decision on the Date to Modify Spousal Maintenance in Arizona

The superior court’s 2016 Order was reversed remanded for the court to reconsider because the superior court misapplied the law in assessing whether Husband had presented a substantial and continuing change in circumstances. Since the case was remanded to the superior court, Wife’s reasonable attorney’s fees she incurred on appeal were awarded.

If you need assistance on your spousal maintenance case call the experienced Scottsdale Arizona divorce and alimony attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC at (480)305-8300 to schedule a consultation with our spousal maintenance attorneys to learn how you can prevail on your alimony case.