Logo
Call Now(480)305-8300

Separation from Bed and Board in Arizona

Posted on : June 3, 2016, By:  Christopher Hildebrand
Separation from Bed and Board

Rodieck v. Rodieck: Separation from Bed and Board

Arizona law in 1969 offered three ways for an unhappy spouse to end a marital relationship: filing for separate maintenance, separation from bed and board, or a dissolution (absolute divorce). The Arizona statute (ARS 25-333) provided that a separation from bed and board “shall be commenced and conducted as actions for absolute divorce.” Does that mean that a family law court could dissolve a marriage in an action for separation from bed and board? This was the question raised in the case of Rodieck v. Rodieck: 450 P.2d 725, 9 Ariz. App. 213 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969).

Facts of the Case

Mary Rodieck, married to George Rodieck, filed for separation from bed and board under the then existing Arizona law. The court granted the separation and divided their property. Mary appealed the terms of the property division. The Court of Appeals, however, noted an initial question of jurisdiction: Does a superior court, under the law of this state have jurisdiction to dissolve the community in an action for separation from bed and board? It was this issue the court found dispositive of the case.

Separation from Bed and Board

The Court first reviewed the history of this method of a legal separation in a marriage. Under common law, it was not a divorce at all. The status of the parties as married people remained the same, with the exception that the wife was freed from the obligation of living with her husband. The Court reviewed state laws to determine whether a trial court has authority to dissolve the community in this type of action. Divorce actions in Arizona are statutory, and the courts have only those powers specifically given to them by statute. The statute then in effect provided:

A. The proceedings shall be commenced and conducted as actions for absolute divorce, and the court may award such sum for attorney’s fees and alimony during the pendency of the action as the circumstances and situation of the parties warrant.

B. The court may make and enter such judgment for support of the wife and her children by the husband, or out of his property or earnings, as is just and proper, and may grant such further judgment as the nature and circumstances of the case require, whether a decree for separation is granted or not.

C. On joint application of the parties and proof of their reconciliation, the court which granted the judgment of separation may revoke it under such regulations and restrictions as the court prescribes.

Jennifer, thank you for being my attorney. I could not have been more pleased with the outcome of my family court hearing. Everything you have done for me throughout this case reflects in the final ruling of the judge. You helped me keep my head together and taught me a lot about myself as a person. I learned so much about my life from observing and listening to you. I will take all the advice you gave me to continue taking responsibility for my choices, continue to put the kids' needs first, and always stay truthful. Your diligence, dedication, and persistence in my case made what seemed impossible, possible. You are a wonderful person and an amazing attorney and I am stronger and more confident because of you.
A Google User
A Google User
20:31 20 Sep 17
I just want to again thank the Firm for working with me all that it has. I could not have done anything without everyone's assistance. You, Chris and Stacey have been and continue to provide me with compassion and hard work towards my case. Also a very special thanks to Kip for taking my case in the beginning. Also continued support from him and his dedication to providing me with his expertise in this matter.
A Google User
A Google User
21:41 07 Nov 17
After interviewing several law firms, I came across Jennifer Shick, and her firm, who I hired to represent me for my Family Court case. Jennifer has extensive knowledge of the law and is determined to bring the truth to every issue involved within the case. Throughout my case, Jennifer was prepared meticulously as well as went above and beyond all of my expectations. Even when the other party tried to differ from the truth, lie to the Judge, and turn situations around, Jennifer remained attentive and provided substantial evidence to show the judge the facts as well as the proof to support what was the best interests of my children. Additionally, Jennifer helped me endure many difficult experiences, situations and inspired me to remain positive throughout the entirety of my case. Her kindness, compassion, and professionalism helped me through very difficult times and made the process feel a thousand times lighter on my shoulders. She truly has my children and my best interest at heart and I trust her perspective as well as her honesty on each and every aspect of my case. She lessened the burden on my shoulders and even when I felt like the case was not going to go in my favor, Jennifer was open-minded and reassured me that the Judge would, in fact, see the truth, which he did and the case went in my favor. After nine months of court, everything finally came together. I cannot declare how much Jennifer has been an outstanding attorney. She addressed each and every issue with diligence, she cares about her clients and their families. Jennifer genuinely cares about her clients and her dedication to the details of the case was remarkable. Overall, I am extremely pleased with Jennifer’s services and I am truly thankful that I was so blessed to have her represent my children and me. I highly recommend Jennifer as one of the best attorneys in Arizona and if the situation ever arises, I will definitely have her represent my children and me again.
Google User
Google User
14:58 04 Oct 17
Dear Stacey and Kip, How can I ever thank you enough for helping me through the most difficult time in my life? I couldn't put into words my heartfelt gratefulness. You both were so compassionate and professional at every given moment throughout this process with me. I thank you from the bottom of my heart. You helped me to regain my freedom.
A Google User
A Google User
16:03 22 Nov 17
I was a client of Attorney Kevin Park for the dissolution of a divorce in 2016. And since I had never had the need to hire an attorney before for any purpose, I was somewhat apprehensive of the process. But the very calm and professional demeanor of Mr. Park eased my fears. He adeptly answered all my questions and I clearly knew the process and what to expect. And the skilled manner he communicated with opposing counsel was perfect. When it came down to negotiating with my spouse’s counsel, I knew I had selected the best attorney for my situation. What I noticed and appreciated was that he was using just the right amount of pressure with opposing counsel as was necessary. If you find yourself in this situation, you will want a seasoned professional like Mr. Park on your side. I'm very grateful that he was my attorney and not the opposition!
A Google User
A Google User
22:14 28 Jun 17
Chris is a smart and aggressive attorney for his clients. Chris always tries to reach a fair settlement of his cases. I’ve represented clients when Chris was the opposing counsel and while he is professional and amicable to work with, he does not back off on what he needs to do for his client
A Google User
A Google User
18:16 18 Sep 17
Kevin Park of Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys was just what I needed for my divorce. He was very approachable and personable. He was quick to recognize what I needed and provided it quickly and efficiently. I hope to never need a divorce lawyer again, but if I know anyone else who does, I will definitely recommend Kevin.
A Google User
A Google User
19:22 23 Aug 17
I feel that Tracey Van Wickler is certainly one of the best family lawyers around. She is logical, intelligent, and truly cares. Tracey always does what is in the clients best interest, does it well, timely and with integrity. She is good at keeping her clients informed as to what is going on and clear in her communication both written and verbally. I have recommended Tracey to other people and will continue to recommend her. I recommended Tracey to someone who was having issues with their ex-wife and his response was, “I know how good she is because I went up against her and she ate me for lunch”. This same person was so impressed with her, he even recommended her to someone else, WOW, that is impressive! I am exceptionally happy with her attention to detail, her ability to explain things in ways that are easy to understand, as well as her ability to keep everyone focused on the most important things. I would recommend Tracey to anyone who may be in need of her services.
A Google User
A Google User
17:44 23 Jun 16
I retained Hildebrand Law after interview a number of firms in the valley. Working with Michael C. was incredibly easy and informative. My case progressed in such a organized and thought out way to ensure that my needs were met. Michael was incredibly proactive and was able to see far ahead into my case to steer clear of some roadblocks. I would not hesitate to recommend Michael Clancy, and Hildebrand Law in general, to anyone.
Bassam Ziadeh
Bassam Ziadeh
21:20 02 Apr 18
I have worked with Hildebrand law for about 8 years. They are always ready to serve, provide guidance and give you a few options. When they provide you options they also take the time to walk you through the pros and cons of each and give you a recommendation of what is best, but will listen to you and support whatever course you choose after making and educated choice. I’d recommend them to my closest friends and feel Chris Hildebrand is now a friend to me.
Larry Flint
Larry Flint
21:53 27 Feb 18
Despite the unfortunate situation I found myself in, Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law helped me maneuver every step with professionalism, expertise, and even a sensitivity that was an added bonus.Chris and his staff helped me even when I didn't know I needed the help. In other words. . . they made sure we did not leave anything undone. And in the rare instance we needed the expertise of another professional, Chris knew exactly who to recommend.Chris also knew, because of his experience, what to anticipate down the road of litigation. That meant we were better prepared to meet the challenges head on, which lead to a more equitable and fair outcome. I appreciated that Chris did his best to meet my every need in a timely fashion, even if I had a simple question that required only a phone call or e-mail or if we needed to talk face-to-face.I highly recommend Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law, PC.
Sam Franchimone
Sam Franchimone
22:09 12 Sep 13
Separation from Bed and Board in Arizona.

Separation from Bed and Board in Arizona.

Although the language of the statute said that the action was to be “commenced and conducted as actions for absolute divorce,” the Court said that this only meant that the same procedure should be used as in a dissolution action. It also noted that section B described support for the wife and children, but not property division. The Court found that the language “whether a decree for separation is granted or not” suggested that the community property was not to be divided. That language meant that the family court could grant a decree for separate maintenance even though a decree of separation from bed and board is denied. But in Arizona, the court cannot divide community property when issuing a decree for separate maintenance.

Other State Rulings

The Arizona statute was taken from a Minnesota law that has since been amended and revoked, so the Court of Appeals reviewed rulings from other states. Generally, states allow the courts to divide property in actions for separation from bed and board only where authorized by statute, and in most instances find that no authority to divide property existed at common law. After an extensive review of the law, the Court ruled that that dissolution of the community (including the division of property) in a decree of separation from bed and board is only authorized if the statute permits it. Where, as in Arizona, the divorce statute does not specifically permit it, the Court must look at other possible statutes that may permit division of property.

The Court found that the Declaratory Judgments Act would grant the trial court authority if one of the spouses made a claim of ownership of separate property. Under this theory, the Court determined that the trial court had authority to award George his separate property.

The Court of Appeals next noted that dissolution of the community is inconsistent with the policy of separation from bed and board. The law authorizes the court to revoke a decree of separation from bed and board if the parties reconcile. It would make no sense to allow legal separation that contemplates reconciliation and at the same time dissolve the marriage. The Court went on to discuss case law holding that all of a husband’s earnings while married – even if the couple is separated – remain community property. That is also inconsistent with dividing up community property as part of separation.

At that time, Arizona law also granted the husband authority to manage all community property during a marriage, whether the couple was separated or not. That would also be inconsistent, the Court felt, with a division of property during separation from bed and board. For those reasons, the Court ruled that the family law court did not have authority to divide the Rodieck’s community property. It reversed the lower court’s judgment other than the award of George’s separate property to him.

Please note this article was posted for historical reference only and does not reflect the current laws in the state of Arizona regarding legal separation.  Please consult with a qualified Arizona divorce attorney for information on Arizona divorce laws.



 

Related Blogs – What’s Hot