Division of Military Retirement Pay in a Divorce
In Neal v Neal, 117 Ariz. 241, 571 P.2d 1037 (1976), the Court of Appeals reviewed several property division issues. These included whether a court can require one spouse to pay a medical bill if the issue is not specifically raised in the pleadings. It also included determinations relating to military pensions and whether they are considered to be community property in Arizona.
Facts of the Case
Mr. Neal and Mrs. Neal were married in 1952. The husband had joined the Air Force five months before they married. He stayed in service during the marriage. He retired in 1975 with a pension of $400 per month. That same year, the couple divorced.
The trial court awarded spousal support of $1 per month to Wife. It also awarded her half of the monthly pension check, which it found to be community property. It ordered the Husband to pay for the amount outstanding for Wife’s hysterectomy operation. From this judgment, Mr. Neal appealed.
The Court of Appeals said that an award of spousal support is left to the discretion of the trial court. It will only be disturbed on appeal if it is clearly unreasonable.
Given the small amount the wife earned, it could not be said to be an unfair or unreasonable burden.
The husband argues on appeal that the Wife did not raise the medical bill in the pleadings. He claims that because of that, the court could not include it in the judgment. He cites the case of Johnson v. Johnson, 454 P.2d 590 (1969) in support. That case involved an award to a wife of money she gave her husband before marriage.
The wife did not ask for the money in the pleading. Therefore, the appellate court ruled that the trial court could not order payment by the husband. The Court of Appeals distinguished this case from the Johnson case.
It said that Wife’s pleadings asked for “such further items as the court deemed appropriate.” That language allowed the lower court to include the debt not specifically raised.
Finally, Mr. Neal takes issue with the judge’s determination that his retirement was community property. The Court of Appeals said that retirement pay is part of an employee’s compensation package. How much Mrs. Neal should receive depends on the laws of the state where Mr. Neal worked while married.
When a couple lives in a community property state the entire time a spouse works, all earnings are community property. Therefore, the other spouse gets 50% of the retirement pension.
However, this was not the case here. The husband joined the Air Force before the marriage. Then the couple first lived in Oklahoma which is not a community property state. All retirement pay attributable to the month’s Husband was single is his separate property.
The pension attributable to the time the couple lived in Arizona is community property. The wife is entitled to 50%. Some of the retirement pension is attributable to the couple’s stay in Oklahoma.
The trial court must determine how much Wife receives of that pension under Oklahoma law.
The Court remanded the case to the trial court to determine how the retirement pension should be divided.
If you have questions about division of military retirement pay in an Arizona divorce case, you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona community property and family law attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in community property disputes and family law cases.
Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.
Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona community property or family law case around today.
Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona
Other Articles About Community Property in Arizona
- Community Lien on Sole and Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Lien in Arizona
- Community Liens Separate Property in Arizona
- Community Property and Personal Guaranty in Arizona
- Determining Community Versus Sole Property in Arizona
- The difference Between Community and Separate Property in Arizona
- Disclaimer Deed in a Divorce in Arizona
- Divide Retirement Accounts in an Arizona Divorce
- Dividing Property Not Included in Divorce Decree in Arizona
- Division of Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Do Rules Regarding Property Apply to Debts in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforce Division of Property and Debt in an Arizona Divorce
- Enforcing a Property Settlement Agreement in Arizona
- Filing a Lis Pendens in a Divorce in Arizona
- How is Property Divided in a Divorce in Arizona
- How to Divide Property in Arizona When a Spouse is Hiding Assets
- Is All Property Community Property in Arizona
- Is Arizona a 50 50 State in a Divorce
- Is Separate Property Divided in Arizona Divorce
- Marital Property Laws in Arizona
- Military Retirement Pay and Divorce in Arizona
- Pensions and Divorce in Arizona
- Separate Property Used to Purchase a Home During Marriage in Arizona
- Sole and Separate Property Divorce Arizona
- Is a Spouse Liable for Credit Card Debt in Arizona
- Stock Options Divided in an Arizona Divorce Case
- Stock Options in an Arizona Divorce
- Unequal Division of Property in Arizona Divorce
- Unfair Separation Agreement in Arizona
- Valuation and Distribution Options For Pensions in an Arizona Divorce
- What is Community Property in Arizona
- What is Separate Property in Arizona
Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about military retirement pay and its division in an Arizona divorce to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.
What’s Hot – Blog