Logo
Call Now(480)305-8300

Arizona Divorce and Division of Retirement Accounts

Posted on : November 6, 2017, By:  Christopher Hildebrand
Arizona Divorce and Division of Retirement Accounts.

Arizona Divorce and Dividing Retirement Accounts

Arizona Divorce and Division of Retirement Accounts.

Arizona Divorce and Division of Retirement Accounts.

There are three broad types of retirement plans; specifically, Defined Contribution Plans (both private and governmental), Private Defined Benefit Plans, and Government Defined Benefit Plans Many employers have multiple plans. For example, it is quite common for a publicly owned corporation to have both a traditional defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan. Many corporations will also have separate plans for hourly and salaried employees. Employees who went from one classification to another may have benefits in both plans – i.e., separate plans for hourly (non-union), union and salaried employees.

Benefits in one plan may be coordinated with benefits accrued in the other. It is critical that you correctly identify the plans involved, and understand the different types of plans you are dealing with, or you may not get your client everything they are entitled to. In addition, in most cases, it is necessary to enter a separate order directed specifically to the Retirement Plan to divide the retirement plan assets.

Understand Retirement Plan Differences When Dividing Retirement Benefits

Dividing Retirement Accounts in Arizona.

Dividing Retirement Accounts in Arizona.

When dividing retirement benefits in a divorce, it is critical to understand the features of each retirement benefit, so that you get your client their fair share of this important community asset. The first step is to identify the type of retirement plans involved. It is critical that you correctly identify the plans involved, and understand the different types of plans you are dealing with, or you may not get your client everything they are entitled to. awarded their community share of the plan is not sufficient.

This article refers to all such separate orders generically as QDROs (Qualified Domestic Relations Orders), though technically the orders directed at governmental plans are not “Qualified” under ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act) and the Tax Code. This article summarizes the differences in the three main plan types, and the issues practitioners need to consider in dividing benefits into these plan types.

Defined Contribution Plans

In a defined contribution plan, the employer contributes an amount to the plan each year for the participant. The contribution can be determined by the participant (as an elective deferral), fixed by the plan, discretionary with the employer (either as a matching contribution or as a non-elective contribution), or some combination of the foregoing. The trustee invests the funds and maintains an individual account for each participant. Earnings are periodically credited to the account balance, sometimes daily, but sometimes only once a year. The participant’s benefit is the account balance. When you divide the benefit, you are dividing the account balance, including any earnings and losses attributable to the account as of the date of division.



Issues to Consider When Dividing Defined Contribution Plan Benefits

If there is pre-marriage money in the plan, how should the QDRO account for it? The problem is that most plans will not calculate the present value of a pre-marital account balance (i.e. what the account balance on the date of marriage is worth years later). Therefore, either the parties need to negotiate this, or the court needs to decide the issue. This is the most intractable problem with dividing defined contribution plan accounts that we deal with on a day-to-day basis. Simply stating that the alternate payee is awarded their community share of the 401(k) plan fails to answer the question. You will need to determine how much premarital money there was, and how to adjust that amount for earnings (or losses) through the division date.

How should the QDRO account for a loan that is outstanding on the date of division?

Dividing Retirement Account With a Loan.

Dividing Retirement Account With a Loan.

Plans will not actually allocate any of the loan balance to an alternate payee, but it may be necessary to include the loan balance when dividing the account. For example, if the participant takes out a loan shortly before the dissolution case is filed, and uses the proceeds for non-community purposes, it may be equitable to include the loan balance when dividing the plan account 50-50. On the other hand, where a loan was taken out before the case was filed and used for community purposes, the loan should ordinarily be excluded when calculating the alternate payee’s 50% share.

When will the alternate payee receive their award?

Most (but not all) defined contribution plans will make a distribution to the alternate payee as soon as the plan can process the order. However, some plans make no distributions until there is a triggering event, such as the participant’s separation from service, or reaching earliest retirement age under the Plan. Even if the plan permits a current distribution, it may take several months for the plan to process the QDRO and the request for a distribution. Therefore, if your alternate payee is counting on receiving a distribution of the award and putting the money to some other use (such as paying off debt or buying a house), you need to know when the award will actually be distributed, or your alternate payee might be in for an unpleasant surprise.

What is the effective date of the award?

Most Effective Date of the Award of Retirement Accounts in Arizona.

Most Effective Date of the Award of Retirement Accounts in Arizona.

In most cases, the award will be made as of the date the marital community terminated (i.e. the date of service). The Plan will account for any earnings (and losses) on the award from the designated date until the award is actually distributed to the alternate payee. However, this can present problems in some cases. If the QDRO is not entered until many years after the division date, the Plan may not have records going back to the date of division, and therefore may not be able to calculate earnings (and losses) on the award. This causes much the same problem as accounting for pre-marital money.

In many small plans, the plan only posts allocations and investment returns once a year, usually as of the last day of the plan year. A midyear division date would therefore not include a portion of the contribution for that year. In addition, if both the division and the distribution are made in the same year, the alternate payee could lose out on any earnings (or losses) on their award.

Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPS) present similar challenges. ESOPS are valued annually, and the annual allocations are often not made until several months after the end of the year. In addition, ESOPs invariably have delayed distribution provisions, so if the Alternate Payee is looking for a cash distribution, they will usually not find it from an ESOP.

Defined Benefit Plans

Dividing Defined Benefit Plans in an Arizona Divorce.

Dividing Defined Benefit Plans in an Arizona Divorce.

Both private and governmental defined benefit plans generally provide an annuity benefit to the participant (i.e. a monthly benefit payable over the life of the participant and their designated survivor). The annuity benefit is determined according to a formula set forth in the plan. At retirement, participants can elect to receive benefits over their life (a single life annuity), or a reduced benefit over their life, plus a benefit for the life of a designated survivor (a Joint and Survivor Annuity). If a participant is married when they commence their benefits, they are required to elect a Joint and Survivor form of benefit naming their spouse as the survivor, unless the spouse waives that right.

Issues to Consider When Dividing Defined Benefit Plan Benefits

The key issues to address when dealing with defined benefit plans are:

• Is the Participant already in pay status (post-retirement) or are we dividing the benefit pre-retirement?

• What to do about survivor benefits?

• Is this a private or a governmental plan?

Pre-retirement Issues

When dividing benefits in a private defined benefit plan prior to retirement, the plan will provide each party a separate benefit. This means that the plan will carve out a separate benefit for the alternate payee as of the date the marital community terminated and will treat the alternate payee as if they were a participant in their own right. Usually, the alternate payee may elect a life annuity benefit beginning at the participant’s “earliest retirement age”, or a survivor form of benefit naming anyone other than a second spouse as a survivor annuitant. The alternate payee’s benefit is not affected by the participant’s continued employment, their delayed retirement, or their death. Thus, when dividing a private defined benefit plan benefit before retirement, the parties can go their separate ways. In most cases, the award will be made as of the date the marital community terminated (i.e. the date of service).

Pre-Retirement Issues in Dividing Retirement in an Arizona divorce.

Pre-Retirement Issues in Dividing Retirement in an Arizona divorce.

Governmental defined benefit plans always employ a shared benefit approach, regardless of whether the participant is pre- or post-retirement. This means that an alternate payee can never get a separate benefit from a governmental defined benefit plan. The alternate payee has to wait until the participant actually initiates their benefits in order to receive anything, and then they share in the benefits as and when they are paid to the participant.

This means that when dividing governmental plan benefits pre-retirement the division cannot be made as of the date the community interest terminates. Instead, the division has to be made as of the retirement date, which may be years in the future (and therefore will include post marital service and post-marital benefit increases). This also raises the potential problem in Koelsch v. Koelsch, 148 Ariz. 176, 713 P.2d 1234 (1986), where the participant continues working past their normal retirement date and thereby delays the alternate payee’s receipt of their share of the benefit.

Post-Retirement Issues

In a private defined benefit plan, where the benefit has already commenced, the participant’s form of benefit elected at retirement cannot be changed. Private plans use a shared benefit approach in these circumstances. This means that the parties can divide the preexisting payment stream during the participant’s life, but understand retirement plan differences they cannot change the form of benefit elected at retirement, including survivor benefit elections (or lack thereof). Therefore, in a private defined benefit plan division post-retirement, the alternate payee may well receive all of the survivor benefits, even if the participant had pre-marital service.

Jennifer, thank you for being my attorney. I could not have been more pleased with the outcome of my family court hearing. Everything you have done for me throughout this case reflects in the final ruling of the judge. You helped me keep my head together and taught me a lot about myself as a person. I learned so much about my life from observing and listening to you. I will take all the advice you gave me to continue taking responsibility for my choices, continue to put the kids' needs first, and always stay truthful. Your diligence, dedication, and persistence in my case made what seemed impossible, possible. You are a wonderful person and an amazing attorney and I am stronger and more confident because of you.
A Google User
A Google User
20:31 20 Sep 17
I just want to again thank the Firm for working with me all that it has. I could not have done anything without everyone's assistance. You, Chris and Stacey have been and continue to provide me with compassion and hard work towards my case. Also a very special thanks to Kip for taking my case in the beginning. Also continued support from him and his dedication to providing me with his expertise in this matter.
A Google User
A Google User
21:41 07 Nov 17
After interviewing several law firms, I came across Jennifer Shick, and her firm, who I hired to represent me for my Family Court case. Jennifer has extensive knowledge of the law and is determined to bring the truth to every issue involved within the case. Throughout my case, Jennifer was prepared meticulously as well as went above and beyond all of my expectations. Even when the other party tried to differ from the truth, lie to the Judge, and turn situations around, Jennifer remained attentive and provided substantial evidence to show the judge the facts as well as the proof to support what was the best interests of my children. Additionally, Jennifer helped me endure many difficult experiences, situations and inspired me to remain positive throughout the entirety of my case. Her kindness, compassion, and professionalism helped me through very difficult times and made the process feel a thousand times lighter on my shoulders. She truly has my children and my best interest at heart and I trust her perspective as well as her honesty on each and every aspect of my case. She lessened the burden on my shoulders and even when I felt like the case was not going to go in my favor, Jennifer was open-minded and reassured me that the Judge would, in fact, see the truth, which he did and the case went in my favor. After nine months of court, everything finally came together. I cannot declare how much Jennifer has been an outstanding attorney. She addressed each and every issue with diligence, she cares about her clients and their families. Jennifer genuinely cares about her clients and her dedication to the details of the case was remarkable. Overall, I am extremely pleased with Jennifer’s services and I am truly thankful that I was so blessed to have her represent my children and me. I highly recommend Jennifer as one of the best attorneys in Arizona and if the situation ever arises, I will definitely have her represent my children and me again.
Google User
Google User
14:58 04 Oct 17
Dear Stacey and Kip, How can I ever thank you enough for helping me through the most difficult time in my life? I couldn't put into words my heartfelt gratefulness. You both were so compassionate and professional at every given moment throughout this process with me. I thank you from the bottom of my heart. You helped me to regain my freedom.
A Google User
A Google User
16:03 22 Nov 17
I was a client of Attorney Kevin Park for the dissolution of a divorce in 2016. And since I had never had the need to hire an attorney before for any purpose, I was somewhat apprehensive of the process. But the very calm and professional demeanor of Mr. Park eased my fears. He adeptly answered all my questions and I clearly knew the process and what to expect. And the skilled manner he communicated with opposing counsel was perfect. When it came down to negotiating with my spouse’s counsel, I knew I had selected the best attorney for my situation. What I noticed and appreciated was that he was using just the right amount of pressure with opposing counsel as was necessary. If you find yourself in this situation, you will want a seasoned professional like Mr. Park on your side. I'm very grateful that he was my attorney and not the opposition!
A Google User
A Google User
22:14 28 Jun 17
Chris is a smart and aggressive attorney for his clients. Chris always tries to reach a fair settlement of his cases. I’ve represented clients when Chris was the opposing counsel and while he is professional and amicable to work with, he does not back off on what he needs to do for his client
A Google User
A Google User
18:16 18 Sep 17
Kevin Park of Arizona Estate Planning Attorneys was just what I needed for my divorce. He was very approachable and personable. He was quick to recognize what I needed and provided it quickly and efficiently. I hope to never need a divorce lawyer again, but if I know anyone else who does, I will definitely recommend Kevin.
A Google User
A Google User
19:22 23 Aug 17
I feel that Tracey Van Wickler is certainly one of the best family lawyers around. She is logical, intelligent, and truly cares. Tracey always does what is in the clients best interest, does it well, timely and with integrity. She is good at keeping her clients informed as to what is going on and clear in her communication both written and verbally. I have recommended Tracey to other people and will continue to recommend her. I recommended Tracey to someone who was having issues with their ex-wife and his response was, “I know how good she is because I went up against her and she ate me for lunch”. This same person was so impressed with her, he even recommended her to someone else, WOW, that is impressive! I am exceptionally happy with her attention to detail, her ability to explain things in ways that are easy to understand, as well as her ability to keep everyone focused on the most important things. I would recommend Tracey to anyone who may be in need of her services.
A Google User
A Google User
17:44 23 Jun 16
I retained Hildebrand Law after interview a number of firms in the valley. Working with Michael C. was incredibly easy and informative. My case progressed in such a organized and thought out way to ensure that my needs were met. Michael was incredibly proactive and was able to see far ahead into my case to steer clear of some roadblocks. I would not hesitate to recommend Michael Clancy, and Hildebrand Law in general, to anyone.
Bassam Ziadeh
Bassam Ziadeh
21:20 02 Apr 18
I have worked with Hildebrand law for about 8 years. They are always ready to serve, provide guidance and give you a few options. When they provide you options they also take the time to walk you through the pros and cons of each and give you a recommendation of what is best, but will listen to you and support whatever course you choose after making and educated choice. I’d recommend them to my closest friends and feel Chris Hildebrand is now a friend to me.
Larry Flint
Larry Flint
21:53 27 Feb 18
Despite the unfortunate situation I found myself in, Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law helped me maneuver every step with professionalism, expertise, and even a sensitivity that was an added bonus.Chris and his staff helped me even when I didn't know I needed the help. In other words. . . they made sure we did not leave anything undone. And in the rare instance we needed the expertise of another professional, Chris knew exactly who to recommend.Chris also knew, because of his experience, what to anticipate down the road of litigation. That meant we were better prepared to meet the challenges head on, which lead to a more equitable and fair outcome. I appreciated that Chris did his best to meet my every need in a timely fashion, even if I had a simple question that required only a phone call or e-mail or if we needed to talk face-to-face.I highly recommend Chris Hildebrand @ Hildebrand Law, PC.
Sam Franchimone
Sam Franchimone
22:09 12 Sep 13

In a governmental defined benefit plan, where the benefit has already commenced, the participant’s previously elected form of benefit is usually converted to a single life annuity, with no survivor benefit for the ex-spouse, regardless of the form of benefit elected at retirement, unless the decree and the DRO specifically preserve survivor benefits for the ex-spouse. Therefore, if you do not address survivor benefits for the alternate payee, you will lose them.

Post-Retirement Issues in Dividing Retirement in a Divorce in Arizona.

Post-Retirement Issues in Dividing Retirement in a Divorce in Arizona.

These are some of the most common issues that arise when dividing retirement benefits through a divorce. There are many other concerns not addressed in this article, which may arise depending on the particular circumstances of your case, or the specific plan involved. For example, a recent amendment to the definition of “disposable retired pay” will impact most military divorces finalized after December 23, 2016. If you are in doubt when you are assisting your clients with division of their retirement account, you should contact a qualified ERISA attorney or QDRO professional for assistance, preferably before finalizing any settlement or decree language.

The attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC would like to thank Erwin Kratz of Arizona’s QDRO Practice for submitting this informative article on the subject of Arizona divorce and the division of retirement accounts. You should contact Mr. Kratz at (520)577-5155 if you have questions about how to properly divide retirement accounts in an Arizona divorce.

If you are facing a divorce, you should also contact the experienced Scottsdale and Phoenix Arizona divorce attorneys at (480)305-8300 at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our attorneys have over 100 years combined divorce and family law experience.