Call Now(480)305-8300

Separate Property Turned into Community Property in AZ | Hildebrand Law

Posted on : August 4, 2016, By:  Chris Hildebrand
How to Convert Separate Property Into Community Property

U.S. News and World Report Best Divorce and Family Law Firms in Arizona

How Separate Property Can Be Turned Into Community Property in Arizona


In Blaine v. Blaine 159 P.2d 786 (Ariz. 1945), the Arizona Supreme Court evaluated a divorcing couple’s property division.

Facts of the Case

The Blaines married in 1935. When they married, Husband owned a personal service business, a home, and some rental property. He also owned stocks, bonds, accounts receivable, and car and life insurance policies with cash surrender values. At the time of the marriage, Husband’s assets, not including the real estate, was worth about $17,600.

The couple had two daughters who were 3 years old and 4 months old when the wife filed for divorce. The family court granted her a divorce in 1942.

Learn How Separate Property is Turned into Community Property in Arizona from Our Arizona Licensed Attorney Chris Hildebrand of Hildebrand Law, PC.

Trial Court’s Ruling

The trial court evaluated the couple’s income. It also reviewed how the husband managed that income. Before the marriage, the husband had a commercial account with Valley National Bank. After the marriage, he deposited all of his business income in that account.

The husband also deposited all money from his separate properties in the same account. All community and separate money were commingled in the same account.

During the marriage, Husband bought the property with the money in the commingled bank account. The property held by the couple at the time of divorce included:

• Cash $6,436.32;

• accounts receivable, fewer accounts payable, $4,056.07;

• Polk Street real estate $2,100;

• increase in cash value life insurance policies $1,110;

• additions to household goods, $1,890.18;

• additions to office equipment $404.39;

• 32 shares of Valley National Bank stock $312.

These totaled $16,308.96. Of this, $786.91 of the cash was the separate property of the Husband.

The trial court ruled that the increase in insurance cash value and the office furniture were Husband’s separate property. The remainder it ruled was community property. It also resolved custody, visitation, maintenance, and attorney fees and costs issues.

Both husband and wife appealed from the judgment.

How Separate Property Can Be Turned Into Community Property in Arizona.

Wife’s Appeal

Custody Issues

The wife argued on appeal that the Husband was not a fit parent. She argued that he should not have any custody time at all with his daughters. The Arizona Supreme Court declined to second-guess the family court on custody issues. It said that the wife could raise the matter at any time before the family law court to modify custody.

Alimony and Child Support

The family court awarded Wife $125 a month for maintenance for herself and the two girls. She claimed this was unreasonable.

The Supreme Court agreed since the Husband paid $150 in monthly support during the divorce. The Court increased alimony and child support to $175 a month.

Court Costs and Attorney Fees

The family court awarded Wife $250 for court costs. The wife argued that this was inadequate and unreasonable. The Supreme Court found that Wife paid over $500 in auditor’s fees to uncover considerable community property. It found the $250 award wholly insufficient and ordered an award of $600.

The trial court also awarded Wife $250 for attorney fees. The evidence showed that her attorneys spent three weeks preparing the case and five days at trial. The reasonable value of these services was $1,250.

The Supreme Court said that trial courts must award attorneys fair and reasonable compensation for their services. Given the efforts of counsel, in this case, the Court awarded Mrs. Blaine $1,000 in attorney fees.

Turning Separate Property Into Community Property in Arizona.

Life Insurance Value Increase and Office Furniture

In Arizona, all property a couple acquires during the marriage, except gifts or inheritance, is considered to be community property. A spouse claiming that property purchased during marriage is his separate property must prove it by clear and convincing evidence.

Sometimes a couple commingles separate and community funds in one account and unknowingly treats it as community property. When this happens, the entire amount can become community property. The Blairs had mixed separate and community funds in their account. Therefore, the Court said, funds in the account were community property.

Likewise, everything they purchased with this money in this account was community property. That included the increase in the cash value of the life insurance policy and the office furniture.

The husband made payments for these items from the commingled account. He did not designate that the payments should be from his separate funds. For this reason, the Court ruled that the community owns the increase in the policy value and the office furniture.

Polk Street Property

Commingling Turns Separate Property into Community Property in Arizona.

Husband bought the Polk Street property with separate funds. However, he asked the accountant to make out the deed in both his and Wife’s name. And after he bought it, he treated it as their joint property. He even paid taxes on the house from community funds.

When they thought of selling the house, the contract included both Mr. Blaine and Mrs. Blaine as owners. The husband reported the $500 paid on the purchase price as joint income. The husband never claimed that the Polk Street property as his separate property until the divorce.

In court, Mr. Blaine said that he did not intend to buy this property as community property. He said he did not intend to gift Mrs. Blaine a one-half interest in the home. No other evidence suggested that the husband intended the Polk Street property to remain separate property.

The Supreme Court found that the husband’s trial testimony was not sufficient, given his prior behavior. For example, Mr. Blaine had no reason to put the wife’s name on the deed. The Court held that the wife owned a one-half interest in the Polk Street property.

Husband’s Appeal

Accounts Receivable

First, Husband claims that his business had $4,657.91 in accounts receivable at the time he married. He said that the trial court should have taken this into account when figuring his separate property.

He argued that the court should have given him credit in this amount of the cash. However, the Supreme Court found no evidence that the husband ever collected the bills receivable. The evidence showed that when the couple married, they had no cash.

The husband presented no evidence that the clients paid these bills. Therefore, the Court said, the trial court rightly disallowed any credit against the cash balance.

Separate Property Can Become Community Property in Arizona.

The 32 Shares of Valley National Bank Stock

When he married, Husband owned 25 shares of Valley National Bank stock. After the marriage, he bought 13 more shares. The bank issued a stock dividend of one-half share for each outstanding share of stock and the husband got 19 shares.

The Divorce Court ruled that the 13 shares husband had purchased after marriage plus the 19 dividend shares were community property. The Husband appealed this ruling.

The Supreme Court found that the 13 shares purchased after marriage were community property. However, not all of the 19 dividend shares were community property. Only those dividend shares attributable to the 13 community property shares—6.5 of the dividend shares—were community property.

Household Goods

The trial court gave Wife the household goods and furniture as her separate property. The Arizona Supreme Court agreed. It said that the divorce court was justified as treating them as gifts to the wife.


The Arizona Supreme Court reversed the Trial Court’s decision. It remanded the case to the trial court to reform the judgment as specified in this opinion. The Arizona Court of Appeals distinguished the decision in this case in the appeal in the In re Marriage of Fong case.

If you need information about how separate property can be turned into community property in Arizona,  you should seriously consider contacting the attorneys at Hildebrand Law, PC. Our Arizona divorce attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience successfully representing clients in divorce cases in Arizona.

Our family law firm has earned numerous awards such as US News and World Reports Best Arizona Family Law Firm, US News and World Report Best Divorce Attorneys, “Best of the Valley” by Arizona Foothills readers, and “Best Arizona Divorce Law Firms” by North Scottsdale Magazine.

Call us today at (480)305-8300 or reach out to us through our appointment scheduling form to schedule your personalized consultation and turn your Arizona divorce case around today.

Arizona Family Law Attorneys in Scottsdale and Tucson Arizona

Scottsdale Arizona Office Location of Hildebrand Law, PC.Tucson Arizona Office Location of Hildebrand Law, PC.

Other Articles About Community Property in Arizona

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Scottsdale Arizona Divorce Attorney.

Chris Hildebrand wrote the information on this page about how separate property can be turned into community property in Arizona to ensure everyone has access to information about family law in Arizona. Chris is a divorce and family law attorney at Hildebrand Law, PC. He has over 24 years of Arizona family law experience and has received multiple awards, including US News and World Report “Top Arizona Divorce Attorneys”, Phoenix Magazine “Top Divorce Law Firms”, and Arizona Foothills Magazine “Best of the Valley” award. He believes the policies and procedures he uses to get his clients through a divorce should all be guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and, quite frankly, actually caring about what his clients are going through in a divorce or family law case. In short, his practice is defined by the success of his clients. He also manages all of the other attorneys at his firm to make sure the outcomes in their clients’ cases are successful as well.



What’s Hot – Blog